Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp622429ybi; Fri, 31 May 2019 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxUN4NPdAeizxRfYSHlNm02xkANjK0EFaiovCqeGeDMzWoch0twe/A6sVwzMQP9Xnq/sQ/m X-Received: by 2002:a65:620a:: with SMTP id d10mr9350226pgv.42.1559309828190; Fri, 31 May 2019 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1559309828; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JA6+68mxFygv0Ku8KHHu2JC5tzRGf7fHhF1D38oKT2nMqKeKSSuIjdNTsAtBTbSiZX iw/7gLe6kZKuGTKu3zZCvrkx2uoup/sNwvI+MScGMi+anqj6lqEurJPWE+l9zTVG0g/k 1ps/6FdsqBEZxDO7NBW9PlHV9pKUqIxeSgNkqV6HUD7YYZbvb8NKbJDMnWr5MIBx2B93 asp4JeUWmR9zEg929dV1BuqDR+7IpD5HpQzH53G8ROGZUOKZY839yYwJqgJfSL+ZWoR4 TKGjNOuUrJWWV1nYuyWXanx5Mxs0Iv7SQw/iajLuCUU9QcvXpC/nD32n6de92o6w955U O50Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=PSAjn4KwfUb+fy4xnXmY5lboTo92P26t6LxyipfbslE=; b=vND1gou80mjrzIVRLh90KXz8IMVtciPJEUqCVgb3CDxJ6HZdapnwD+rq2OWUd/2TSc 1dRuGre3sbGM8u+8VjH8d/IUMC9Af5xIQ5IHpGK99jxR9ogie1jxLcy7q7BV/IZ0QNSy 2Ul02lxwGjDTm9PuCXxitZy1a3CFuFi99Euyv9nv5tiKkikbKhaqPOk7GwroqpNwcyQx Fivc/OyIsoB4LGwMha6v2aSW/6iQzjB9qQIo6b6sZ0fvkn2q1I7oBG6fMHc0fzLe+K5O ILFu0J7TX+YB2o4JqVClY6eAgMcPEi/qQhlnWDGKzoYP9Zhi0P3RMSOMk0EGgmA5KCe8 d3pQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n15si497291plp.354.2019.05.31.06.36.51; Fri, 31 May 2019 06:37:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726330AbfEaNgu (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 31 May 2019 09:36:50 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org ([173.255.197.46]:42040 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726037AbfEaNgu (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 May 2019 09:36:50 -0400 Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 9BA5E1C1B; Fri, 31 May 2019 09:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 09:36:49 -0400 From: "J . Bruce Fields" To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Jeff Layton , Jiri Kosina , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [trivial] nfsd: Spelling s/EACCESS/EACCES/ Message-ID: <20190531133649.GA1251@fieldses.org> References: <20190527122132.5617-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190527122132.5617-1-geert+renesas@glider.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Thanks, applying for 5.3.--b. On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 02:21:32PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > The correct spelling is EACCES: > > include/uapi/asm-generic/errno-base.h:#define EACCES 13 /* Permission denied */ > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > --- > fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c > index fc24ee47eab51ad4..c85783e536d595de 100644 > --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c > +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c > @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ nfsd_setattr(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, struct iattr *iap, > /* > * If utimes(2) and friends are called with times not NULL, we should > * not set NFSD_MAY_WRITE bit. Otherwise fh_verify->nfsd_permission > - * will return EACCESS, when the caller's effective UID does not match > + * will return EACCES, when the caller's effective UID does not match > * the owner of the file, and the caller is not privileged. In this > * situation, we should return EPERM(notify_change will return this). > */ > -- > 2.17.1