Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>
To:     linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, bfields@redhat.com, tytso@mit.edu,
        adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, hughd@google.com,
        anna.schumaker@netapp.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>,
        stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] nfs/super: check NFS_CAP_ACLS instead of the NFS version
Date:   Sat, 13 Jul 2019 06:12:00 +0200
Message-Id: <20190713041200.18566-4-mk@cm4all.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190713041200.18566-1-mk@cm4all.com>
References: <20190713041200.18566-1-mk@cm4all.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

This sets MS_POSIXACL only if ACL support is really enabled, instead
of always setting MS_POSIXACL if the NFS protocol version
theoretically supports ACL.

The code comment says "We will [apply the umask] ourselves", but that
happens in posix_acl_create() only if the kernel has POSIX ACL
support.  Without it, posix_acl_create() is an empty dummy function.

So let's not pretend we will apply the umask if we can already know
that we will never.

This fixes a problem where the umask is always ignored in the NFS
client when compiled without CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL.  This is a 4 year
old regression caused by commit 013cdf1088d723 which itself was not
completely wrong, but failed to consider all the side effects by
misdesigned VFS code.

Signed-off-by: Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfs/super.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index f88ddac2dcdf..886ad89af676 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -2353,11 +2353,14 @@ void nfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct nfs_mount_info *mount_info)
 	if (data && data->bsize)
 		sb->s_blocksize = nfs_block_size(data->bsize, &sb->s_blocksize_bits);
 
-	if (server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->version != 2) {
+	if (NFS_SB(sb)->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS) {
 		/* The VFS shouldn't apply the umask to mode bits. We will do
 		 * so ourselves when necessary.
 		 */
 		sb->s_flags |= SB_POSIXACL;
+	}
+
+	if (server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->version != 2) {
 		sb->s_time_gran = 1;
 		sb->s_export_op = &nfs_export_ops;
 	}
@@ -2383,7 +2386,7 @@ static void nfs_clone_super(struct super_block *sb,
 	sb->s_time_gran = 1;
 	sb->s_export_op = old_sb->s_export_op;
 
-	if (server->nfs_client->rpc_ops->version != 2) {
+	if (NFS_SB(sb)->caps & NFS_CAP_ACLS) {
 		/* The VFS shouldn't apply the umask to mode bits. We will do
 		 * so ourselves when necessary.
 		 */
-- 
2.20.1