Received: by 2002:a25:8b12:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id i18csp3503001ybl; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 17:47:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy5D1bZFDOa1uTO4jrFT3vZshavVO42sFj0gqDrwFbUxM0+gEumXIDcQAqpP7jEsgRXBRZF X-Received: by 2002:a63:6f41:: with SMTP id k62mr833753pgc.32.1566780466071; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 17:47:46 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1566780466; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=reyGQnd3AmWHtSxKqvc0mSpoAXuIK2dS18DeUrMJ1LDmWNENMbwQCGXSab4ZvgB8gJ f1PcIUM0toeKHDvJV2ZxLq/GsbSnN5UxTJuatCOJHAg5zCLhwJRH9RYdoPHf2RpAm+qZ WXmGSiJrL+/wwboKyANXVsVoUqwQvtiE7Z3TqFdOzJZ5YlD+kBI8s12SGisbFQ3VET5v RywfKG1KGUHUPYtifCtZLNazzGGSKLYJ1n5wwRNYC9ax/d1RtiaELDk5eYJzcTihMYMV jRugtAnEUNaAXlO5sgRrgWd2SFCIEESnrYm2B4/3rcISiQr6e3Gos/qdZQKCZeiizQ+y KG5Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc:to:from :subject; bh=kZcBsPqsSiS15O4fh4Fy7HoceChQ3IOgw2Zu/yOQVoY=; b=POUxJcqDTr+kyrftcl06lkgFyOZAt5Xd4Nmmc20rx/qW3VpcDVJaRst4wL9yWL2p/O mgdJLkqzVHklTU+ZIIBgBZK0CyCFnS5bOa8hKVfNHCPQ1O7R6aAe6eu7L09Ie/z+4RmB bKDfVh4/B5oQKH4612KkWr7nVgVbpj91zCvcRZ5sSTG703jePe+AY7Qy1/tHbjDWtgUC spxLDZysr81ENAL4rE24fI2epidlRmhBR0wz4I9po298L21IForHbPbiJu7Fk/7X5Mqd CoprLGgj6+q0P0yQ8kzKvcxsf2WKxgzpe3pzklzXcqpzA2xOqYD5bBBm3IzNDaEvrXBv cxnQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m7si8101557pls.110.2019.08.25.17.47.05; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 17:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726434AbfHZAjY (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:39:24 -0400 Received: from mail.cn.fujitsu.com ([183.91.158.132]:27338 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726312AbfHZAjY (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:39:24 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,431,1559491200"; d="scan'208";a="74253732" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2019 08:39:22 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.85]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3B44CE045C for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 08:39:17 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.167.226.33] (10.167.226.33) by G08CNEXCHPEKD03.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 08:39:35 +0800 Subject: Re: NFS issues about aio and dio test From: Su Yanjun To: CC: References: <975395cc-62f2-843f-cc71-82339b2869cd@cn.fujitsu.com> Message-ID: <65ea4ea2-548f-1546-059a-af901bba2e87@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 08:37:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <975395cc-62f2-843f-cc71-82339b2869cd@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.33] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: EA3B44CE045C.ADA96 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: suyj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Spam-Status: No Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Any ping? 在 2019/8/6 14:08, Su Yanjun 写道: > Hi, > > When I tested xfstests generic/465 with NFS, there was something > unexpected. > > When memory of NFS server was 10G, test passed. > But when memory of NFS server was 4G, test failed. > > Fail message was as below. >     non-aio dio test >     encounter an error: block 4 offset 0, content 62 >     aio-dio test >     encounter an error: block 1 offset 0, content 62 > > All of the NFS versions(v3 v4.0 v4.1 v4.2) have  this problem. > Maybe something is wrong about NFS's I/O operation. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > >