Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190808201848.36640-1-olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>
 <20190904205015.GD14319@fieldses.org> <CAN-5tyGcT6rCpzOB3coj4H19-BuDsBRheD=rsRHZthn7STNq0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <YT1PR01MB29074F44ABABECF04D4A18E0DDBB0@YT1PR01MB2907.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <YT1PR01MB29074F44ABABECF04D4A18E0DDBB0@YT1PR01MB2907.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From:   Olga Kornievskaia <olga.kornievskaia@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 6 Sep 2019 10:23:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAN-5tyEqPsybNe_e4XLqxRNygo1ci446Wq0jvVEFEBhip-eXdg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/9] server-side support for "inter" SSC copy
To:     Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca>
Cc:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
        linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 8:13 PM Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> >Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 4:50 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> What do we know about the status of NFSv4.2 and COPY support on Netapp
> >> or other servers?  In either the single-server or inter-server cases?
> >
> >I'm unaware of any other (current/on-going) implementations. Netapp is
> >interested in having (implementing) this 4.2 feature though (single
> >server case for sure not sure about the inter-server).
>
> Just fyi, I have implemented the single-server case for FreeBSD. (The code is
> currently in a projects area of the FreeBSD subversion repository, which makes
> it a little awkward to set up for testing at this point, but if anyone is interested,
> just email me.)

That's great Rick. Have you done any interoperability with the linux
implementation? Will the code go into the main freeBSD release (or is
already there)?

> I haven't yet implemented the async case, but plan on doing so soon, rick