Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1172448ybe; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:27:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy7GCqu+S1VjwK5LU8kcp2KLR/KYFjyzPL6mE0DQBLonYlj4lzdgXhYw3xTfM8MjWZTlFK8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:244c:: with SMTP id a12mr30235995ejb.288.1568222830625; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:27:10 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568222830; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Uugnrx4ykPA2YyVYFct/qOSq2GYnWVwYcxJAiMceoGJgAGVScTBabEh6qei8PMQm1R /hTR7ogcty9OCY9gdYMMHZ/UcErfriD83mYud5HdgbPULEy8A/FD4B+B6D4RVxPeoNBc qKN1LKOXPM1zv5R/nvKZcsOGYUF+2zspkqyRkCHooeZvhkQn7rPzLGCtiHNl9jsQNWwW 7YqaKDVtr5M7t2fhEZqlSibR+lTCzLNZpmwErMdAnp+LN5EHK54fLmeHtZHKYt/blM2P hhQYj6uVSpVMyP3JYYLQWu53mjx145mQDum6oE1/VdbDucSMuwTTbLFPBLHqrsnZ+3N1 7yQw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=tJ61BT9lYN2LJVaKKdHfNLy2aptR17VrpNCxzV1L7bw=; b=jV4HDCmF1a2boh3G6Px5BHz7dwZgffk/D5gqYONAsTSZmMO+vPSbwFL5XoZKaGfd71 AhOi/hrSUf8XCZxBLD8BiaFkVtSlDspH8cypUBNsOkB1R4MoqXzO2izB0hRFXjcwSysm IGwif+lU46UhkhieUC67ofb5Q5E1rX62lybGq09Y6Yhy4NdYWT6FxaQpIJoYjZcqg4ht iFjbZBE796Y0Y2KEv5LzdFO60vd1kENlVPwXA6fM82I4MkzUuyp2xEudiUSCqBDGYgCE o89jjN+zktJN1caAxb9YXo5imVBClDUhtcOYjxbcLdNSZG98eWkcKP9nXP7MLFWSP3UP 9Iqw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f30si13475421ede.435.2019.09.11.10.26.37; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:27:10 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729130AbfIKR0X (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:26:23 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:48178 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728897AbfIKR0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:26:23 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7B030A76BE; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:26:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.176.1] (ovpn-64-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.64.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F300F5DA5B; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:26:21 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Coddington" To: "Chuck Lever" Cc: "Jason L Tibbitts III" , "Bruce Fields" , "Wolfgang Walter" , "Linux NFS Mailing List" , km@cm4all.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression in 5.1.20: Reading long directory fails Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:26:21 -0400 Message-ID: <429B2B1F-FB55-46C5-8BC5-7644CE9A5894@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <0089DF80-3A1C-4F0B-A200-28FF7CFD0C65@oracle.com> References: <4418877.15LTP4gqqJ@stwm.de> <4198657.JbNDGbLXiX@h2o.as.studentenwerk.mhn.de> <20190906144837.GD17204@fieldses.org> <75F810C6-E99E-40C3-B5E1-34BA2CC42773@oracle.com> <0089DF80-3A1C-4F0B-A200-28FF7CFD0C65@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:26:23 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On 11 Sep 2019, at 12:39, Chuck Lever wrote: >> On Sep 11, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Benjamin Coddington >> wrote: >> >> Instead, I think we want to make sure the mic falls squarely into the >> tail >> every time. > > I'm not clear how you could do that. The length of the page data is > not > known to the client before it parses the reply. Are you suggesting > that > gss_unwrap should do it somehow? Is it too niave to always put the mic at the end of the tail? Ben