Received: by 2002:a25:c593:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp1175415ybe; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzf+Ru+qNc4UiH73eF5h5kxodkuOnAj1c773NxKZsb9868mMvJ4mf62ofVc/C3BAk6f0+YQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1e7:: with SMTP id i7mr39097284edy.103.1568223016711; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1568223016; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=uLcZ5DQoBmdKL2ZTfm0LGIO/o+NzirZliEzg9TiGkskYSch5kyrwB7olbwZryCDA3q 8Q5ARmKKPy0Ex637c/CpfA3G9eaWE26IziuTlLFjdlomCOaopVIWHKxxwcpKJ/n5b6E/ xpA0bzgejHaENRE5Yf5QL8LcSVTmUaBPyXxAH9DGfrOO/WL1ianBxMeLiXiR0KzIC1Y7 txFitJeCo0j3gGwLdaGxCSUp/+HPjAlSkRv6ivrLkQkYIfAdiMHctu8Mpu5xjPeyEQiF 6nRrgVBp1008jstf8PVnWdnPp5SeTJbooOQrQfvH0troynJj/Ip6J8zqCDg7T/NIpDee Odqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=UEJgI0K/wsiyEeOunkTIYcRLgivQFu7RhmUW+kwjMz0=; b=cOf7gEWZq94R4ypI7dJsT1qJ07wUiygFgZt9wdtiOBMNVEibmSorHrIEw57hl3RiRw sN5be6QW06gz+Ye45iW9E9MbLiQ+1D/mjVdRBdd4AAHrFDPOyTVUFM4EjGLhGf14Qrc7 9AcMXMkDGgrOrCG07AmiA9Nt+KFVHOwBABP2NyI+pByhx+wExh7A1jY6DzeMKp+3X6Q0 GR5NHLDd0JMzpEODFJjLrsVaxVVnUlHZPa8kfuM71Ma21H5QmMyvTaXtYUd/4465+l18 c+UEcQKoZ/QDi+6meFknFggtlA+h4p2nHooVaT68GnUxVeudxcMa6xHwUPfkSbxe/Ev9 Gs8w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z6si3625837edp.79.2019.09.11.10.29.51; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729617AbfIKR1T (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:27:19 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43712 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728897AbfIKR1S (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:27:18 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97A4307D945; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.176.1] (ovpn-64-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.64.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E7805D9E2; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Benjamin Coddington" To: "Chuck Lever" Cc: "Jason L Tibbitts III" , "Bruce Fields" , "Wolfgang Walter" , "Linux NFS Mailing List" , km@cm4all.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression in 5.1.20: Reading long directory fails Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 13:27:17 -0400 Message-ID: <7D8C7BBD-8266-4A5A-9C95-0C8B57C10333@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <429B2B1F-FB55-46C5-8BC5-7644CE9A5894@redhat.com> References: <4418877.15LTP4gqqJ@stwm.de> <4198657.JbNDGbLXiX@h2o.as.studentenwerk.mhn.de> <20190906144837.GD17204@fieldses.org> <75F810C6-E99E-40C3-B5E1-34BA2CC42773@oracle.com> <0089DF80-3A1C-4F0B-A200-28FF7CFD0C65@oracle.com> <429B2B1F-FB55-46C5-8BC5-7644CE9A5894@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.48]); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On 11 Sep 2019, at 13:26, Benjamin Coddington wrote: > On 11 Sep 2019, at 12:39, Chuck Lever wrote: > >>> On Sep 11, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Benjamin Coddington >>> wrote: >>> > >>> Instead, I think we want to make sure the mic falls squarely into >>> the tail >>> every time. >> >> I'm not clear how you could do that. The length of the page data is >> not >> known to the client before it parses the reply. Are you suggesting >> that >> gss_unwrap should do it somehow? > > Is it too niave to always put the mic at the end of the tail? Naive, even..? Ben