Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
To:     anna.schumaker@netapp.com, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/26] nfs_clone_sb_security(): simplify the check for server bogosity
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:17:36 -0400
Message-Id: <20190913121748.25391-15-smayhew@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190913121748.25391-1-smayhew@redhat.com>
References: <20190913121748.25391-1-smayhew@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

We used to check ->i_op for being nfs_dir_inode_operations.  With
separate inode_operations for v3 and v4 that became bogus, but
rather than going for protocol-dependent comparison we could've
just checked ->i_fop instead; _that_ is the same for all protocol
versions.

Reviewed-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 fs/nfs/super.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 89751ce21110..6f4983fc3937 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -2569,7 +2569,7 @@ int nfs_clone_sb_security(struct super_block *s, struct dentry *mntroot,
 	unsigned long kflags = 0, kflags_out = 0;
 
 	/* clone any lsm security options from the parent to the new sb */
-	if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_op != NFS_SB(s)->nfs_client->rpc_ops->dir_inode_ops)
+	if (d_inode(mntroot)->i_fop != &nfs_dir_operations)
 		return -ESTALE;
 
 	if (NFS_SB(s)->caps & NFS_CAP_SECURITY_LABEL)
-- 
2.17.2