Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Reply-To: dang@redhat.com
Subject: Re: support for UDP
To:     Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
        linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
References: <CAN-5tyG97C6GTXOz5G6z8SL+jNKYa0siWnSfjijRNVucFs3KwA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@redhat.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <080bf93a-0e66-bb56-a54f-5496c688bb70@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:37:48 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAN-5tyG97C6GTXOz5G6z8SL+jNKYa0siWnSfjijRNVucFs3KwA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 9/13/19 11:14 AM, Olga Kornievskaia wrote:
> Hi folks,
> 
> I'd like to gauge what people think. Do you think we'd ever do a bold
> thing like drop the UDP support in the upstream kernel (obviously with
> a plan to fade it out with a config option that we did with the des
> support)...
> 

Yes, please.

Daniel