Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4019272ybg; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:32:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy3rjQMDA+sB+9r4Rh5ypJACkL1jQWeK1z4xmRq2nEATAi5jvz8HxIIS7BYxLJEwU1vVunK X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:f1d0:: with SMTP id gx16mr1810322ejb.62.1572334379867; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:32:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572334379; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=LZQk+Y0npc8NFGNM36MPzgkJyIowOCJnT3wfgAFp3E1IVbBKoUQQBGADmhbJ/aJvTq s22EQ1T43AvDqhhyV74C/0WUqdRKM4ey/m/QUNqjUvfzcxSs+/i46I8Kcsunmi8f3mVn AqcDDPSavqqNWm3JgcUUnoB9jE6eznjEHtXfiGFqPpRt0AvpC8z94jAj4tHPCEY9KtbM OveSKiJvWMkufjeBqSdMFMeHDRKXRHjr3tRaeO6051avYRArTSbf1nB31l65dRPrcOBn cZVBkk9Qcnrx09JGg+SE9uAxwyd/7tjgiHbiF7iC1k/3tdGH1wKIojAXFuvyIqVMH+nk 96RQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Wrfy7js4FwmYN6ZihrGV2KaC+O7OtZPGaMjEZ8LuzXg=; b=ueiRFjyn6Cn4fo9ky+NYd0qwCiZbfZMcFaL5qTPYbC8x+yABJ2fuL7AFSrnMtg7VZF JZO+XROFBaeHMM6sf+oJPooEpoHkpMqCCJTqz3Byz1don3EKuJxJ2Jcca8JtuvfRIhwS SwJ7i66Qluz9Pif53km11nxlP0PMdrmZj0KApU6AxmrbtCkaHZ+3V76rO0mxG/xQ+QJM ZnZTxOPo4wWLT1G5FggqOR/xZh3hxlUzYj1wxfBjCxXeQNEg5rutzCXk8JBPzMhk0ilC V/fEK2mEqR9V0kv5OktsDECkcEk8jWc5pQyUrR35kDfh5C6olzH3YfGyB8oxONZPIg0U vSoA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MfHxHShN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n5si7151631ejb.67.2019.10.29.00.32.26; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=MfHxHShN; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730065AbfJ2HVA (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:21:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f51.google.com ([209.85.128.51]:54012 "EHLO mail-wm1-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729741AbfJ2HVA (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 03:21:00 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f51.google.com with SMTP id n7so1339506wmc.3 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:20:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Wrfy7js4FwmYN6ZihrGV2KaC+O7OtZPGaMjEZ8LuzXg=; b=MfHxHShNsnjl642jTif3Mjn4v6qE1BLbZ0h1V1gDW4MvjktWrqxVq27I+koHKFI0pc IWH/HC7n2aZI2IJt9cgVr0OWsBYsXVWz3iYimxEx9PkfuWw7Cxi6aQ/MNzRKqnkvT4/6 7ZJ9y6Bji1ME/PflVS140IUHdscrw+1z7Lrh8OEGuOMtyVZIqTsIKAv7L3EF8rZ/eoeV axv0gGaaHPqJ0W+mfj7lzgIO8FNXP3m2hz4sefPfKjeW1mzGPoh/LdLQ9pbOLyGXp+KN 6oLmRSkHCC4gYkrwOGyLPgGmBsE29NVY/mxa5THGJBXp2RDACG/IHqey/dCW8D6zl2UC 2XWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Wrfy7js4FwmYN6ZihrGV2KaC+O7OtZPGaMjEZ8LuzXg=; b=rdXxNAZU1OfZhlIcg5Esly66AIU1IJL6LwFquuZxG4eLOtQeojtgaPq9jCWuTJWLnT WoKDR+ymcqvG0J5e25NmWzRdkci5sAx1L9I80boJgWvtZ8FGoMf/zDosUa7i4q+We54l dH+jEOJ6Np2Wz1PESK5kzLWPns0bya3O2hkIWQo6vX8HGCA2kuFTB6lF7/mi/9pJfzjv uF4cOVnrrArSnlMg6C7cuHfQ92blc+smf3Jtdg62BR+qYFcm4yftFSN50/EiXhgGrWL2 7G2OYrL2RB9ov4sX47ieak+bQdWNPXO5/6czIX+L6/qi0PfV3nn9PiNR8F3L66lcAnGW l/rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU1AM19gA9cFUWeeyMujfDGljn25Q5hKr8vMU7usoYp8WrfG5c9 Ju2DaoLEY7IdTYCHcnzyVTgAUpawq+1vcIhuvxfwKA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ca52:: with SMTP id m18mr2412902wml.110.1572333658079; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 00:20:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1589957450.8701645.1572273893609.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> In-Reply-To: <1589957450.8701645.1572273893609.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> From: Naruto Nguyen Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:19:28 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS latency and throughput minimum requirement To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" Cc: linux-nfs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Tigran, Thanks a lot for your advice. I will try to find out the bottlenecks first. Brs, Naruto On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 21:44, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: > > Hi Naruto, > > NFS performance is a function with multiple variables: > > - CPU > - kernel > - TCP > - Networks > - Disk subsystem > - File system > > and every component has it's own set of knobs to turn... > > I will inter the question: What is expected latency and throughput > of your applications? Can you identify the bottlenecks? At the best > try to reproduce the load with application itself or fio and then > go one-by-one and tweak the performance. > > Regards, > Tigran. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Naruto Nguyen" > > To: "linux-nfs" > > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2019 6:25:24 AM > > Subject: NFS latency and throughput minimum requirement > > > Hi everyone, > > > > Could you please advice me how to identify the minimum NFS requirement > > of latency and throughput on a specific system? I have some test cases > > to test performance of NFS and tune the system to have better NFS > > performance but I do not know how good or bad with my > > measurement/result. > > > > Thanks, > > Brs, > > Naruto