Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Message-ID: <1D90658865CE4379A951E464008D872E@alyakaslap>
From:   "Alex Lyakas" <alex@zadara.com>
To:     "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc:     <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1567518908-1720-1-git-send-email-alex@zadara.com> <20190906161236.GF17204@fieldses.org> <CAOcd+r0GRaXP3bes2xw6CFJmPJDTfAAMB7j6G3gzCVKDTC8Sgw@mail.gmail.com> <20190910202533.GC26695@fieldses.org>
In-Reply-To: <20190910202533.GC26695@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH] nfsd: provide a procfs entry to release stateids of a particular local filesystem
Date:   Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:47:09 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        format=flowed;
        charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi Bruce,

Have you had a chance to review the V2 of the patch?

Thanks,
Alex.


-----Original Message----- 
From: J. Bruce Fields
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 11:25 PM
To: Alex Lyakas
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org ; Shyam Kaushik
Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH] nfsd: provide a procfs entry to release stateids of 
a particular local filesystem

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:00:24PM +0300, Alex Lyakas wrote:
> I addressed your comments, and ran the patch through checkpatch.pl.
> Patch v2 is on its way.

Thanks for the revision!  I need to spend the next week or so catching
up on some other review and then I'll get back to this.

For now:

> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 7:12 PM J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> 
> wrote:
> > You'll want to cover delegations as well.  And probably pNFS layouts.
> > It'd be OK to do that incrementally in followup patches.
> Unfortunately, I don't have much understanding of what these are, and
> how to cover them)

Delegations are give the client the right to cache files across opens.
I'm a little surprised your patches are working for you without handling
delegations.  There may be something about your environment that's
preventing delegations from being given out.  In the NFSv4.0 case they
require the server to make a tcp connection back the client, which is
easy blocked by firewalls or NAT.  Might be worth testing with v4.1 or
4.2.

Anyway, so we probably also want to walk the client's dl_perclnt list
and look for matching files.

--b.