Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
From:   Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
To:     trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        paulmck@linux.ibm.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, neilb@suse.com
Cc:     Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] NFS:remove redundant call to nfs_do_access
Date:   Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:17:51 +0000
Message-Id: <1582885071-20641-1-git-send-email-zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

The fast lookup in nfs_permission is done by calling nfs_do_access with
or mask argument with MAY_NOT_BLOCK.
However above predure is redundant:
1) when variable mask didn't have MAY_NOT_BLOCK bit, the fast-path part 
of nfs_do_access will be performed twice when missing the cache.
2) when variable mask have MAY_NOT_BLOCK bit, the second nfs_do_access will
not be invoked at all.

Also the rcu_read_lock and rcu_read_unlock is unnessarry because rcu
critical data structure is already protected in 
nfs_access_get_cached_rcu.  

Tested in x86_64 
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>
---
 fs/nfs/dir.c |    9 +--------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/dir.c b/fs/nfs/dir.c
index 193d6fb..37b0c10 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/dir.c
@@ -2732,14 +2732,7 @@ int nfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
 	if (!NFS_PROTO(inode)->access)
 		goto out_notsup;
 
-	/* Always try fast lookups first */
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask|MAY_NOT_BLOCK);
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-	if (res == -ECHILD && !(mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)) {
-		/* Fast lookup failed, try the slow way */
-		res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask);
-	}
+	res = nfs_do_access(inode, cred, mask);
 out:
 	if (!res && (mask & MAY_EXEC))
 		res = nfs_execute_ok(inode, mask);
-- 
1.7.1