Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1609:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n9csp2291321pja; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:45:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsPPKdlozJZ9y4f+qfOk9KyrrncKDBt20ptm656osMfp7Cab8CD/iMFkQ8xb7EhiMgccYZu X-Received: by 2002:aca:4fc3:: with SMTP id d186mr1387459oib.171.1585251900957; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:45:00 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585251900; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=cA8Jr7mQ+sm6/VuHmeYAnhDu0z3wsHu+zzUQcG0u1SKIsr5GbyL5wtMtC/bru91BRw CNR1lQQQSUNl8hfqFJBNlNvJAh8+JULLJyfPqXk/AKspx3rySuuwXnBQNyuFpAQ/9nqk Avw4JXMDKfDM6JM790rVsYa2GcoQ6XaFdZn3F6+jDgNroJ+CiC4kuCtNyA27N/7X/WyX 4aMebd0pHJNCyQrSZTvniwJ2ozXMwdfll/HVBAGFnL1FrP/xHOGT+Hz0QNA5efbIq3PE yPl4YLqMjjsd+OIhpL5cOG/mQ0N3TQO7IWWwaX0iJO5BgnG68u/xiHujsGwp0ABBoCre 7Grw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:cc:to:from :date:subject:ironport-sdr:dkim-signature; bh=kkMAo9tlALypU50SmLIoNgIeRamMDYFBFxphReA70RQ=; b=kIioOi7xnwnw5GvGDqXyYXOdoty78htpyS0fhUlS6bbfXHzK6sh0loFn1wk/hFgP74 0uFTGuaUQ2gIOFCHOyUJ8aKLpHJimNHqigbaO8CwjlReEO8ZPPzFtmfCwHXqMDoKLauG Fn/GTcGgthVh1YGSV7CYGCgnEA65yWcsjtTK5CbD5zVAUtTO2Cx5wZoxZ/dQ7YrbHeHy xfDW1UBwW4V9xtVXKQFfVFmtHnbr3csj5SFvTJ1qZdDopu9heYTywiEonAfHIf62IN8e 5XCYZ5tFVkKs5mlPzdtfbZysoUpCvR/wjGdx9TL/Wt+c6salXQFq6R7h0dUT7gDBs46H GJOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amazon.com header.s=amazon201209 header.b=lg0e8Uwx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amazon.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a13si1708780otk.158.2020.03.26.12.44.36; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:45:00 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@amazon.com header.s=amazon201209 header.b=lg0e8Uwx; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=amazon.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726340AbgCZTnX (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:43:23 -0400 Received: from smtp-fw-9101.amazon.com ([207.171.184.25]:43175 "EHLO smtp-fw-9101.amazon.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726067AbgCZTnX (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:43:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1585251803; x=1616787803; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to:subject; bh=kkMAo9tlALypU50SmLIoNgIeRamMDYFBFxphReA70RQ=; b=lg0e8UwxaQ71I7iN8uf1OI4RE0qUY1v6r86a4eepk7Uo+AxmfdrIBJDC 6R+rLGIKHRfPX6r7faiMV2sGimtFpv2RkGpXr6kbRMCsyn8nApcZg4OEK Rth9qMFhz0yyoCurUkQEhT2li39vZkUGgtqq58OMnMmTvP/5GuP5GDLR4 w=; IronPort-SDR: Wq6+MP2377wZj7q4xMEyB/mwh8AAKn/fxyGz9+qchUYScaFOWFEhhHCu2Felrj8CI8OWGijB9i mO9L7IvU4SzQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,309,1580774400"; d="scan'208";a="25296185" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] NFS client user xattr (RFC8276) support Received: from sea32-co-svc-lb4-vlan3.sea.corp.amazon.com (HELO email-inbound-relay-2c-4e7c8266.us-west-2.amazon.com) ([10.47.23.38]) by smtp-border-fw-out-9101.sea19.amazon.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2020 19:43:21 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (pdx4-ws-svc-p6-lb7-vlan2.pdx.amazon.com [10.170.41.162]) by email-inbound-relay-2c-4e7c8266.us-west-2.amazon.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A48CA1FFA; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EX13D34UWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.112) by EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.135) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1367.3; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:19 +0000 Received: from EX13MTAUWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.135) by EX13D34UWC001.ant.amazon.com (10.43.162.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:19 +0000 Received: from dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com (172.23.141.97) by mail-relay.amazon.com (10.43.162.232) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.0.1367.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:19 +0000 Received: by dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com (Postfix, from userid 6262777) id BDF42D92A4; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:43:19 +0000 From: Frank van der Linden To: "Mkrtchyan, Tigran" CC: linux-nfs , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust Message-ID: <20200326194319.GA3398@dev-dsk-fllinden-2c-c1893d73.us-west-2.amazon.com> References: <20200325231051.31652-1-fllinden@amazon.com> <1885904737.8217161.1585249393750.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1885904737.8217161.1585249393750.JavaMail.zimbra@desy.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 08:03:13PM +0100, Mkrtchyan, Tigran wrote: > Hi Frank. > > The new patchset looks broken to me. > > Client quiryes for supported attributes and gets xattr_support bit set: > > Mar 26 11:27:07 ani.desy.de kernel: decode_attr_supported: bitmask=fcffbfff:40fdbe3e:00040800 > > However, the attribute never queries, but client makes is decision: > > Mar 26 11:27:07 ani.desy.de kernel: decode_attr_xattrsupport: XATTR support=false > > The packets can be found here: https://sas.desy.de/index.php/s/GEPiBxPg3eR4aGA > > Can you provide packets of your mount/umount round. > > Regards, > Tigran. Hi Tigran, This patchset works against the server side patches, and also works against a FreeBSD-current server. Is this failure happening with your Java server? Let me look at your packet dump and compare it with a working scenario. - Frank