Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 13 Apr 2020 15:29:07 -0400
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc:     Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] svcrdma: Fix leak of svc_rdma_recv_ctxt objects
Message-ID: <20200413192907.GA23596@fieldses.org>
References: <20200407190938.24045.64947.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
 <20200407191106.24045.88035.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net>
 <20200408060242.GB3310@unreal>
 <D3CFDCAA-589C-4B3F-B769-099BF775D098@oracle.com>
 <20200409174750.GK11886@ziepe.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200409174750.GK11886@ziepe.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
From:   bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields)
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 02:47:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 10:33:32AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> > The commit ID is what automation should key off of. The short
> > description is only for human consumption. 
> 
> Right, so if the actual commit message isn't included so humans can
> read it then what was the point of including anything?

Personally as a human reading commits in a terminal window I prefer the
abbreviated form.

I haven't been doing the redundant parentheses and quotes either.  Was
that dreamt up by an Arlo Guthrie fan?  ("KID, HAVE YOU REHABILITATED
YOURSELF?")

--b.