Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3114412ybz; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:06:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKFhmotkQA6UOqUuEFAbMKDy8FjnzUCkAXz3aeLlJuJhwrFuF3sAgL2pSfCJhd/ZSdz6pbb X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:784c:: with SMTP id p12mr12579090ejm.346.1587344819680; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:06:59 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1587344819; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ukcrAjKwdOYfNv0bJRQGHFRaIgqzEnOntWQaAdQlaxtBcc1FDBwyokj0Wi4YGAxIQ/ Aqz9ro3HNjYBi6fkhWSmteZV0jbDLhx7WsHE9aQWv5malQ7xNTmaG7L5+rWabf+hMHxM Ow3SyHzkRDet8ly9E+MSp3d0gj7YcBPo4UHJVs7fl5LNL0Dwmpj9t8KeFE0AfKdR8vY5 6GL1/csi6qrLs4nZtEkBlH8BzUCEIuHUUIW62RLgdGlvI9rRU5xaKeeTUADG5rL63BiX IgObJyVSE2/mdpVhvjpPlWq8S2vEg5xIOyfBsd6zvMzde4P1iXgKJMTZkmP9Ylm2J0pf KYSw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=UAr7dQ1lkh5Q0MOSA+C5E6a/FibwZsB/6txDi0hUANQ=; b=f5JeT/MQIfxMo1GJ/vfnJSGyuWKQEtYvzLXYF0eunCbhwWfmE7rhBwjlNS8NfPjLP9 awn3oUrFrFoalc7C517gWjHQzcK2T9wH1cY0qd4bTGiF5waMWIS9SezOnjdgkqOGPa52 icboA/B3Nwtj+2BitnT3ri10UUH1WdVvk49C2/Ce2Edvi+Sgxsr6UpbQM4IJddhTl3ZW T7H6rMRCL/Owo0N7iBek2zbQAILyehYVOgmranyCwsZRWS7uW3kjhm4wUmjb4rYJI0VP rAraqBx9xywsTqrxnAV0ymyINkDdF0Z5/ubveBg23Q8rCkHJTKB01esMOVJNbnZJJEkJ 7xDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@cjr.nz header.s=dkim header.b=NDBi3jMq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=cjr.nz Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y4si17931350edy.398.2020.04.19.18.06.24; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@cjr.nz header.s=dkim header.b=NDBi3jMq; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=cjr.nz Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725959AbgDTBGK (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:06:10 -0400 Received: from mx.cjr.nz ([51.158.111.142]:30162 "EHLO mx.cjr.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725949AbgDTBGJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:06:09 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 455 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:06:08 EDT Received: from authenticated-user (mx.cjr.nz [51.158.111.142]) (Authenticated sender: pc) by mx.cjr.nz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D1BC7FCFC; Mon, 20 Apr 2020 00:58:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cjr.nz; s=dkim; t=1587344312; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UAr7dQ1lkh5Q0MOSA+C5E6a/FibwZsB/6txDi0hUANQ=; b=NDBi3jMq9coPi8YRdzSeQB0Y1zLZ5hA6rcD82Eutcxbaudjs5HacYYdLbi6/XFiHiW6JRa xjQLgknfdLihkIdqkp0WpVPftqBnWUtiIIxrPn+F+Wf/3dMwavyxXObm3+jjxI+Va6Hhvh U2FQE/cL0C4A+YZJnwXe0GMtk/HbCTg5XJ9hqhj1QketlwCv9ANViPQF66gOvZD3Nli1Kj EcyM3gGEZ6JHL0qzfei5TjQ73DVLh5pQJ0Z6OLuCUogsIsjcILpPR2vJzOlNqnIkpewArk TuiohUvQfc08jNbN9FPzp2dA5vcdK/vskwY+ueQhovb/36hVqlUgPs1IKPmm1Q== From: Paulo Alcantara To: David Howells , Steve French Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-nfs , CIFS , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, Network Development , LKML , fweimer@redhat.com Subject: Re: What's a good default TTL for DNS keys in the kernel In-Reply-To: <927453.1587285472@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <3865908.1586874010@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <927453.1587285472@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 21:58:25 -0300 Message-ID: <87imhvj7m6.fsf@cjr.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org David Howells writes: > Steve French wrote: > >> For SMB3/CIFS mounts, Paulo added support last year for automatic >> reconnect if the IP address of the server changes. It also is helpful >> when DFS (global name space) addresses change. > > What happens if the IP address the superblock is going to changes, then > another mount is made back to the original IP address? Does the second mount > just pick the original superblock? It is going to transparently reconnect to the new ip address, SMB share, and cifs superblock is kept unchanged. We, however, update internal TCP_Server_Info structure to reflect new destination ip address. For the second mount, since the hostname (extracted out of the UNC path at mount time) resolves to a new ip address and that address was saved earlier in TCP_Server_Info structure during reconnect, we will end up reusing same cifs superblock as per fs/cifs/connect.c:cifs_match_super().