Received: by 2002:a25:1985:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 127csp3399857ybz; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:20:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIO/+I63HkpTo+1dMf0L/bpmGFjTpjtWfrxnHh8pYQHve/bfwnM6GsNueyhJAPuT/yogfWj X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:374b:: with SMTP id e11mr22866750ejc.283.1588026055879; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:20:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1588026055; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=p49gsFaeFWLF3B+2myV0hJcUki6Iw87EF6aZGLqKw8xBxGnrOvJnj1MowfIHSDJbmM +h5iEsdeXlzymq8FwqE1vOLuwf/C3aBFaWQKgfhJAr5H5RFA8sf+u2WIJCgmB/z6F+ol 6YUN1K46bAYUnHwCJtTsf4avdeHuAkK9dnyIiGgpxiuPj9izL5IkIopRyVV/oyqCt238 fcEVaEDn5oLR4ks65a0qElZCkUuUrDCcHCvEUBUEt+hxMPzzBLU8VU0tEt3X59jkFk9z FUf8UyLKL5ePfNTSw9+cjQy2/YzPAa/I8kXbwbbnAE/x9uHrP2k0HkD9B7efvexyqflE 0b2w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:from:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:date; bh=kklp8bLzNScwHAT2a1UceSJn5LnsgPJNhsQeVQoZpiw=; b=X6LSL5Pnc8FCEtUNnxbw1bjzHwPxXsZWkD3O1+OEuXOIVYThAgzmiNpijE2AWI+lGN OvbsKrjPNKypTu+BpUZc//Q4ib5GrzwZOo+xIcwMYRkA+sdQkovaagYQeONttHTlUG0o WLUdB07hrn4zV77B5k97smRGHUx8bJYL8vQSOFMR94DTtnx6qFejsqV3iGG3LSFapyR8 CXXv3JJxekLrEDvWvH80HaoM0Bv4n1srsCQiyf2RIZzdgG7iHzHhj3SQQBFONkRg+nwz QCIACLiVs76Wf50jLX9PljdEhHL0acehGbe702jqIp/O21M8ApTsK4XLowaZWQgDjSxs GpOw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id oo21si567875ejb.453.2020.04.27.15.20.26; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726259AbgD0WUW (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:20:22 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51882 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726204AbgD0WUV (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:20:21 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00::f03c:91ff:fe50:41d6]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4847C0610D5 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 5788383B; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:20:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:20:21 -0400 To: sea you Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: TestStateID woes with recent clients Message-ID: <20200427222021.GH31277@fieldses.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 04:32:27PM +0200, sea you wrote: > Time-to-time we're plagued with a lot of "TestStateID" RPC calls on a > 4.15.0-88 (Ubuntu Bionic) kernel, where clients (~310 VMS) are using > either 4.19.106 or 4.19.107 (Flatcar Linux). What we see during these > "storms", is that _some_ clients are testing the same id for callback > like ... > Due to this, some processes on some clients are stuck and these nodes > need to be rebooted. Initially, we thought we're facing the issue that > was fixed in 44f411c353bf, but as I see we're already using a kernel > where it was backported to via 90d73c1cadb8. > > Clients are mounting as > "rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,noatime,vers=4.2,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048576,namlen=255,acregmin=600,acregmax=600,acdirmin=600,acdirmax=600,hard,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys" > > Export options are the following > "(rw,async,wdelay,crossmnt,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check,fsid=762,sec=sys,rw,secure,no_root_squash,no_all_squash)" Sorry for the derail, but the "async" export option is almost a never good idea. > Can you please point me in a direction that I should check further? Off the top of my head, my only suggestion is to retest if possible on the latest upstream kernel. --b.