Received: by 2002:a25:683:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 125csp4562602ybg; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 10:58:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOhzKAPgGOtMK0bAwC7MGyY3sEt4dJZOmPTlXTUYMzCrLS9LgQHUlygXjEeaXguj1nfXjA X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5f93:: with SMTP id a19mr21459793eju.10.1591639101030; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:58:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1591639101; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fPIoXRxX1IJELLu2sxxWrGJkQvRq4DTHE2pPnbwoJTp08e6QR6G1/tdP5pr7FtQILT /TmFXEvv8hq35R9zMSVFhWBVoFYhXmwGu59J7d8/j0F/74Izi4C2X8wqISbi2rTDVd5o v5JlnJkY38A0ixe/Vsf3lZu6LipAYLlyK9OBUx07bc0ESo8BXqfESJ9WokEK9Tgw8yi0 QQ6+Rr5zHQPd/s4X/7/uo4oJ2vR74efve8wjxJXsGGVWOJD+1eC4/+2b9IkNW4rmzVzb wwFoJFFjLpYQeuQTcwURSCi1Xu1XdoNmZh24AAXFJ564ycdU5cljl9fXjqJ08BYrcBrO ir3w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=O8HgSybCppZ3kiuZxENhpvekwq1khjx4CKxkw6qW1ms=; b=Od/FHiSQptcbEP0sHY21aJXfHd/lez5hNfV9XQ965AOmG84EmUYZyQ6Fw0M2GI6jkb zesUup73GwcZ0zwP0uau3QtH6MWOcq7rJ5uXi1TOdD9E+uHv7i1uAsMitKmKDgky7sv3 JFq0dkk+ayFYheqmZBXmVhtY/gOeMmogWV82NtCVaEJrK99hYPPg+yha5jDXdIWkZnhu iPmRzjo38/2KzGvLPRs2SyoEAaLmkAhiyE/I7LuLsO6P5GIJ7icCI5Ja1NXRwaz4WCea Azruj9zyyzqnphXiK63zDMbO9TtDzNmlSaW4kB9ri1MdyKgCkZJ/q4UVtNmLFlw9cJrL QMtg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h3si2617465ejd.142.2020.06.08.10.57.45; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729451AbgFHRxk (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:53:40 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.10]:51131 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726097AbgFHRxj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:53:39 -0400 Received: from 'smile.earth' ([95.89.4.93]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue108 [212.227.15.183]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N9Mh8-1iusXs1tbg-015Kkf; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 19:53:28 +0200 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd at 'smile.earth' From: Hans-Peter Jansen To: Anthony Joseph Messina , Chuck Lever Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address in nfsd Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 19:53:26 +0200 Message-ID: <13519623.o9HzBvYcLm@xrated> In-Reply-To: <2B6CBC8C-A1D4-4C39-AF45-958847C99572@oracle.com> References: <15780697.tcFqIYE18H@xrated> <9727420.yF10LQ635x@xrated> <2B6CBC8C-A1D4-4C39-AF45-958847C99572@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:MMaA86dsNPwMAvL6QXFzHtyHniiJ09LciPQhpKQ3Sgk7Nx6DZRO OcrI1xVb8hLPo1wx4Zr2fetYqmlRaGmzMuFWa3Qsd+rvLnJw7yhbCyrfcgsYJMmgJOTSwRj QZ4dLuTTnqUq/CljNPqKxvityvec1RN/YKA+bsS7thu5tVAQhRAvU5V2wG64IawbXQzeJTs Ss/U/QBq6mCEsXOwuHrSg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:ALEAB6CXgMA=:KWsvEXJ2HUupv0lZbq+APl OkSQOdc0hwv6ArEHVaUIswNudUKDhNagSnsmrc9ivTD6YHbKoZCcl5sVw4nJBGnrfy8FCu+qM V2th9Nde1QTiEBb7V6OasTMEHoik+3czUyXGTRlC/O3qw/p68/JO8o5QN1Wm8bjr3DJOCFDbb oR71NziyxquaiR7I41YqF1KCrD/wgWdrxy3XLOUm/+sb3QAYQhxSTLSWfJKthmGG/OssKKI9P dW5eef62RlXmGxLBvXWuf9HHa1EQvtfpx4mDBfHagFQIrNYQWCXqQv8hngCoVN4WhZ6rC2Njd DY5DiMWePXz6Q2B5+3DjMtQ26j/+LWqYZFfpVfqlcqpUDa+N6rkg1GfcpAfeVz7JlEsx1yK4y Wba9KIsDgXkrAVImTcF9kZG1azJpefAakO3wdCVuHXadWWEkNQE+vh+3vunvw2VxmYgAWcibV EPGS9TmOPwa+xZKnjzr1rD6t+o4ANMkiQSkbtxT8uT1q/Jq+lXHC5RFq9DNcxasr35UyrzkSh 7RXs2Zuz6g+jpFEz8lPCMkcVzIw6FdSLu13s5FrSX8x+yYdeeN7rU72dpTHiRjoLof5r68UOV Vym85m4utqknblYa0Y7bUuJv9q4bsNG+QI4ky/xLOgFY4tnA0YVVNOhX0iXkeQR3SWTgbALhR /v8aBV7JdU34YqYXPBZ1gwT99C2F78ZuStLGjqk3k7EkXbIYwm5I34ch/2zdTr5RrMUxoDazo g5oS4IuIGQcnPYU08GkkpTWbnhWAgj28uwrzEkifpU/JEUTINfREhRFkj0lnls/+1mKCmGG7q oIdVYbl86ogIj08DeswqzMgJ1oBKkv1FVCuQd9iB8SuAuAfSv8= Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 8. Juni 2020, 17:28:53 CEST schrieb Chuck Lever: > > On Jun 7, 2020, at 1:44 PM, Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2020, 18:01:55 CEST schrieb Anthony Joseph Messina: > >> On Sunday, June 7, 2020 10:32:44 AM CDT Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> after upgrading the kernel from 5.6.11 to 5.6.14, we suffer from regular > >>> crashes of nfsd here: > >>> > >>> 2020-06-07T01:32:43.600306+02:00 server rpc.mountd[2664]: authenticated > >>> mount request from 192.168.3.16:303 for /work (/work) > >>> 2020-06-07T01:32:43.602594+02:00 server rpc.mountd[2664]: authenticated > >>> mount request from 192.168.3.16:304 for /work/vmware (/work) > >>> 2020-06-07T01:32:43.602971+02:00 server rpc.mountd[2664]: authenticated > >>> mount request from 192.168.3.16:305 for /work/vSphere (/work) > >>> 2020-06-07T01:32:43.606276+02:00 server kernel: [51901.089211] general > >>> protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xb9159d506ba40000: > >>> 0000 [#1] SMP PTI 2020-06-07T01:32:43.606284+02:00 server kernel: > >>> [51901.089226] CPU: 1 PID: 3190 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G O > >>> 5.6.14-lp151.2-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed (unreleased) > >>> 2020-06-07T01:32:43.606286+02:00 server kernel: [51901.089234] Hardware > >>> name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P7F-E, BIOS 0906 > >> > >> I see similar issues in Fedora kernels 5.6.14 through 5.6.16 > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1839287 > >> > >> On the client I mount /home with sec=krb5p, and /mnt/koji with sec=krb5 > > > > Thanks for confirmation. > > > > Apart from the hassle with server reboots, this issue has some DOS > > potential, I'm afraid. > > If you have a reproducer (even a partial one) then bisecting between a > known good kernel and v5.6.14 (or 16) would be helpful. I would love to bisect, but this is my primary production machine, that needs to be up as much as possible. Apart from that, I'm about to leave the site for a week and been severely time constrained for the next couple of weeks.. Sorry. Anthony? -- Pete