Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp182588ybt; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:56:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLM4gb/yVz6xcpmDKnnj3OFW8jT8ZS40XRMrmbaKospDLQUSymZbs/sU6AsYjWYPkBc4mL X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d848:: with SMTP id f8mr17527742eds.329.1593564968768; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:56:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1593564968; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=mRp74osG5FJHXC22uOOxtlnEJe/cw4sduB4lYiHfwYeWcKk3XI9ZXK++8ZWXBqSct0 WfE0MjyEWhmaso7vFHeVsusFheqNUk8qEDC1HiJzrhwcQ+6uegYAGJyIqd766kvRYjt/ W6tVB0OkIaRbbRxqIwHxzJfH7WQJPxKNeNL3NBxYGTDW/cdvOqN1vkDTHMs/uX9IRUR1 BX6dzPLwQEOYhgNeoivYBYylS+Evem7gCE1L/mSeBRCcOl3C/sU9d6caZaIxkVsWzVj9 9ZX0LgtCtCtbj/cpm3Pue9WBw6VlDPPx9HA3UVHxmWKRTjDAnJ10fRwLfacGIzDiFFa/ QY4A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:to:subject:message-id:date:from :mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=w5fiJW6n3sAfYyHmixvuwkB+kRXMBP2micRtspTnPKM=; b=rE3soOGCVVVEoNt/EbtY0HF/RB1vVoDwFAMduHypFsqYk7tXcbpWXpjN2KGfzmkZNx 1qUueGI0xvzs8J/ghAeVExtcJonFMiax/Gm4CqMdtZdvOenRgtV1x1BOIBDgJxOomUxi GGY2VAI5p8bMPL5ib6sQPsNek7Y4uVDxqOYX3RcnRF/5CoVscVhyivXAfXkpCxCoNJlA NSzT5FGa7waKu4ous5HVmDSb2dxqAKjSKQGHxHtfssjt6pjOGaKFKr89JYxa8TVq/aNd ws5W6oVq9bztLHa6SW3dnQOoTEj3rFXkHGPMJnDapGUH/w7/JQJOftmd5tTWWZvtHOSL hipQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=sJPyZ4Et; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v10si2635835edy.595.2020.06.30.17.55.32; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=sJPyZ4Et; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726135AbgGAAz3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:55:29 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37382 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725805AbgGAAz2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jun 2020 20:55:28 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 385BEC061755 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:55:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id f7so19026026wrw.1 for ; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:55:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w5fiJW6n3sAfYyHmixvuwkB+kRXMBP2micRtspTnPKM=; b=sJPyZ4EtLJLajdteuRpipuX/VbUcHLIe55XzDT4YielPuQGcxZkXZ7sTuwXIijWR+E njXXmgnUnk1dOnZFtDmavEniH9d83fobGBwn+VCeLnEYetsTGa/USvs6TnVMcFoBlptM LccEch4gcsdqO/tD7gF/annqoPXvjmsLQqYQlcjAB2ctvfBxi2BlzLIfctr9mfLShTQw nOW+GpRTeUakIh6hBEYGmL8x8hGrbVC5GNwI6LWs+RzP7mTX4dp3sM+JMw33Fh1gAVDP qY2zDZ4AFdbhvNBlZb7nHPXU61XVQLoWSTvN1Bknj102anCWfMSWLgWl0/9yvFm1fN7N VWNA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w5fiJW6n3sAfYyHmixvuwkB+kRXMBP2micRtspTnPKM=; b=X/gAJGZd7TQhSrH+K9lP1FtN6r1fOguK0rMXJuRjYuITgRb14tKTIH7/EyQKd0N5sn dzlPvEeDvc4kJXcqoydIybfuTV/8kBAi6yJaDE+n+Lw4nBLg36LPtjxgJYtNDj6XHM1A kEhlcn+uiPRBgax4Q7UQMsCeonIfQswomYot9DqKeKQPPl0yi2MGFk1FRdPlsDg/OPEs 5UOS4Kr/B3kNM8nTm6FXx+LHuVNBJuYJ5CCsUnwkp/0Q0kRajPq+vH61WAo5Z8tC/KB/ aI1nEYIlS3iGSX3STktmRPiH9Ky+V5CYy0B1RDIhVnstev7Fgz2yJUGs5UTIWF7DbIXe T/Ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531olOeFbx/98d87hLSwCHrDNvXNSsaAu0WiPC2zgsLCOhVK2Lxj r4cHcQykWkbNL2eymfDkF3f9mn3yNUsDvV4UQaOUeAWT X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6088:: with SMTP id w8mr23567575wrt.49.1593564926547; Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:55:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pradeep Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 17:55:15 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: File create performance between NFSv3 and NFSv4. To: Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Hello, While testing a performance issue, I noticed that the number of creates that an NFS client can do over NFSv4 is significantly lower compared to NFSv3. I'm using the test below: https://github.com/distributed-system-analysis/smallfile Command run: smallfile_cli.py --operation create --threads 128 --file-size 1 --files 1024 --top [ 128 threads, each doing 1024 file creates of 1K size] This gives around 1169 creates/sec with NFSv4.1 and 8073 creates/sec with NFSv3. This is with the exact same client and server. NFS server is tuned to use 200 threads. When I looked at tcpdump, I noticed that over NFSv3 multiple parallel requests are being sent and NFSv4 is pretty much serial. Is there anything that I can tune to improve NFSv4 performance w.r.t to file creations? This also shows up in benchmarks like SpecFS SWBUILD's INIT phase where millions of files are getting created. Thanks, Pradeep