Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp1802938ybh; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:36:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz+1cwz9psCxiOd5vHWCNp3QKTNu77BQrNkt1m+RUfcNt/Ts5ysoEixZ3Yep2aS743MquuL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5246:: with SMTP id y6mr20523647ejm.316.1595255817434; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:36:57 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595255817; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VV551kfUPcTEs/lV30BctAYP2uLSOUSnFCUy9PCXnLzWtS3r4cydOeFyy+RmykcsBK V2Uw78Zg0ZWwBGlyI2jRqw4NAwcFFTO6YvB+pQfX4JnFA/sEg/Hb6qIjxNsFuFyPW3mZ 8bSW9MrpWF1OkJDQo6F06BVxkB7dRqPRT3iOshsgvWBLGK2Sofid9LqzaVfJQm/vwIrp bancN5rtxt7M1Vf1mau2QK1u32M9QP/lWlI4qeL0slWPYX7Mb9w3uRuCw3oP3Ypcnxvc zBlHNBVl/NNMIbb+0x6VIvNjZlufRS0bY+Guo/Gc1sOfIiOo21QKzsNo9G0f8MsTi7Pz efiw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=XgwS7WhoC+ROaWOKgXulQWuFaxKqS2ANyHtHzXzgSFU=; b=FL1mHb38j1mJpLBH2/m0iFwj5YAy74OG0KMHHQQ/LMh1caeBJBerK2a8huckpK4bVB +B5DwmWBOCCvFfcZQi3vwjl4IQ7TXwr8NdOIWkma3Hyol1PYxHmvHMDz+cyzLlFY07nu jNv3eQyT22PMl1cEDJtYzmsurS428p3Lc2sBq6hmmn0KTKN0IPMY3nuIdHbZJ9fSYcYB Y6iYhOL37DSqoCcnMPiEEbY8HJ8epU3X5jxa8Rrq0xjXapV/5TbbTyGJXRzJFbKlnz67 P8BBXUxLwkYO/Wb49AjwoZxUQZwtBzQ0MJQrE/fIEEaOejK+H9bBsVitxKsf7tqjs5eJ mwlg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id sa7si9043048ejb.668.2020.07.20.07.36.25; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 07:36:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726046AbgGTOgX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:36:23 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51582 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725934AbgGTOgX (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 10:36:23 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72241B82E; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 16:36:20 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: "bfields@fieldses.org" Cc: Trond Myklebust , "ltp@lists.linux.it" , "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "alexey.kodanev@oracle.com" , "yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] Remove nfsv4 Message-ID: <20200720143620.GD21201@dell5510> Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20200720091449.19813-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20200720141255.GA25707@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200720141255.GA25707@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Bruce, Trond, > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:32:09PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:14 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > > Reasons to drop: > > > * outdated tests (from 2005) > > > * not used (NFS kernel maintainers use pynfs [1]) > > > * written in Python (we support C and shell, see [2]) > > > [1] http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/pynfs.git;a=summary > > > [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/547 > > Unlike pynfs, these tests run on a real NFS client, and were designed > > to test client implementations, as well as the servers. > > So if they get dropped from ltp, then we will have to figure out some > > other way of continuing to maintain them. > Just for fun, I grepped through old mail to see if I could find any > cases of these tests being used. I found one, in which Chuck reports an > nfslock01 failure. Looks like it did find a real bug, which we fixed: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/8DF85CB6-5FEB-4A25-9715-C9808F37A4B1@oracle.com > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20160807185024.11705.10864.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net Thanks for your explanation, this obviously justify these tests in LTP, unless you want to move it to git.linux-nfs.org and maintain on your own. Kind regards, Petr