Received: by 2002:a25:e74b:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e72csp99329ybh; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxz+fC/BhG89XnPxHeLEF/B46OtQhIb3uEWVKltQTEcJSq2UjC0DY/N6KNRXerriEEL2fbH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7387:: with SMTP id f7mr20923975ejl.131.1595269054141; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1595269054; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pPH88IxQPCyETEQeB/ozejRuAZEEfWmnx8LNl2yOD6YEkHGenxqM8zr7kMjO3HeOiA KFoi43I9EhHMWPs/AUJL+hfllqeobLVLgsJ+dcGwjYW3hutqtZMgXmbclQt1dPvKQLpz 8r8TdZzeY9fgnuUEp20AD4k1P1wk61PlAyUXgvdeg3RDXgyb5Tpv7xfeqqD/T+ITJppI z2d+dT2W/s9VFs/B+WPCxN/kqyqr6nNP5wuRxWrSV6gnsAtps7iwAI5j30Gfc78xT054 eosP2pgOeWQbrn2nu+QZA9NQNzVZZiQGEC7dcqQTpWJKo9FfgvlAbdMuMvSEt8Dy08VY 7kBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=91slaV00oYg1dRTjAEXfkjvUYYyk9+XltSrkE0iwEDU=; b=mxom9nMXFATUg1AhSQ98wODCtfhe1HDTgUO6uhAMmCrZ+RH/9m9aBWWwouDZ5ETTOG /D5XrXkzT6vcufRKPYEYVZIn050hTjoTXcF/cCK88DJ/prmmLlvb7VIcrMeCJ/mmAkkE Y+2kUXkj8/zb4zhbfSvyw3UVSGdaVKYUvTyATDX5pPqDHvzmNnwn5svDlPTVlIBoiZUt z+sjrzT7BW1LLOBLFxua3b8wi+iWWTaBjjqrXDi+YJSmsXOu59pjfBaWvOD97HvYDkN4 K3cvBPMOr4bgl5vo+RivM8LIBcIT9/lRSqgi38pP3W4V3P7UJlugu+42d7y0cyMpJUtz vGLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id rn4si13099383ejb.29.2020.07.20.11.17.09; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 11:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729430AbgGTSRA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:17:00 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50350 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728703AbgGTSRA (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jul 2020 14:17:00 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0122AACFE; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 18:17:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 20:16:58 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Trond Myklebust , "ltp@lists.linux.it" , "bfields@fieldses.org" , "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "alexey.kodanev@oracle.com" , "yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com" , Cyril Hrubis , Yong Sun Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] Remove nfsv4 Message-ID: <20200720181658.GA32123@dell5510> Reply-To: Petr Vorel References: <20200720091449.19813-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20200720151742.GA16973@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200720151742.GA16973@infradead.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Christoph, > On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 01:32:09PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:14 +0200, Petr Vorel wrote: > > > Reasons to drop: > > > * outdated tests (from 2005) > > > * not used (NFS kernel maintainers use pynfs [1]) > > > * written in Python (we support C and shell, see [2]) > > > [1] http://git.linux-nfs.org/?p=bfields/pynfs.git;a=summary > > > [2] https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/547 > > Unlike pynfs, these tests run on a real NFS client, and were designed > > to test client implementations, as well as the servers. > > So if they get dropped from ltp, then we will have to figure out some > > other way of continuing to maintain them. > NFS tests using the kernel sound like a prime candidate for xfstests. In the past Yong Sun moved some ext4 related tests from LTP to xfstests. LTP has various NFS related tests. IMHO more important than where these tests should be is if anybody has a deeper look into them an cleanup them / rewrite them from scratch. Kind regards, Petr