Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp820164pxk; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:53:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxu6T56xjqfP/RKt1IxmL5EtVJuaiU6F6NvZNEiKxouAjeZ7xW1jL7oCAsD6NTOPX44ery4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:b68:: with SMTP id cb8mr10728804edb.350.1601589203338; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:53:23 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1601589203; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VdJopHIfkRl0HiI6pREyJGIBgYaBpUPTLVFe+r6IcpeOfUEiu6MXkl/GB8MeQL/GQe B8mfFEDRB/rEcjc80S+KNDGfZqlR+hYVgUZIzD20Mpx97GAh+iing88tjRzDmcAE/ifH sja0UI0JMvQIWAILpvi/DMhWCch0p0EC92nkSOZ7W6sXnIEYPPBydSRbyDWBKcJznOFl qKDUjw5rb1BQLa9gW54uDUxhNXMvjD21kuQOExCCOKFtv0e+5E4LXxMp9pN6AxE9KNw6 UQ3oKcrlNJyxCQgqzntJgPYlQg+JnBCT1e5tHQunojBdj8HbDdA5azjmf1xGyQvism71 SXjg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=UCSUvSFQvCKhvoAoVY6VZnuOrqoR3/W5ejs4q6mC5Tc=; b=LO686+s0J0T8DvIHG370dJYE+4wXMPECIhJx/2xXuDZNGgElQgCECNXAkswBmZCTcW Y56TYjnBu/yQpbdzltXHAXa9svRHuOtjuZqLGs5l6Kddtg9700xdlgSWCkTF3WYJPTzK cmSYGHgCtRuBngl16wQfHpPWfAizIpNErfzbZ0+07yvdlWNKIo5PkxjZW6xkzPRF6VZB 6F9rFbGqLzaEYXEJopLLuzpOpGCDBrt7X/PSVniYKZs6X+ZfrxrUydfL6wRZmaanuenH SgmMVA9e1pnPhF1FOV0qED/i0oIwMCfehPoQFCQIFNH7jDLARJGs1pEwAguWV5Le7Z4d +BjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=tTcleBQn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a18si4486895edn.400.2020.10.01.14.52.59; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 14:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=tTcleBQn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733088AbgJAVwU (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:52:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727848AbgJAVwT (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:52:19 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CF8FC0613D0 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 14:52:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id EA7AE1C79; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:52:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org EA7AE1C79 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1601589138; bh=UCSUvSFQvCKhvoAoVY6VZnuOrqoR3/W5ejs4q6mC5Tc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tTcleBQnK4xb5gJiWMZQORsHMShoSfvrZc3SRfCRvNozuZR1CBnhphEsAAeD5nIVh /S9bn+GNKjyT+WNUJo8oZFPKTUufADWfinzoHW+UxJUeAxIcqqcGrZMqezLOcwb22F vF0LqvViQ7C77WBzdg7LmlYKCn4s5VVEZjfwj1n4= Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:52:18 -0400 From: Bruce Fields To: Dai Ngo Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] NFSv4.2: Fix NFS4ERR_STALE with inter server copy Message-ID: <20201001215218.GL1496@fieldses.org> References: <20200923230606.63904-1-dai.ngo@oracle.com> <20201001205119.GI1496@fieldses.org> <9a60ba5b-aefe-d75b-683a-fa0f4db6ae24@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a60ba5b-aefe-d75b-683a-fa0f4db6ae24@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 02:48:07PM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote: > Thanks Bruce for your comments, > > On 10/1/20 1:51 PM, Bruce Fields wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 08:18:54PM -0700, Dai Ngo wrote: > >>Have you had chance to review this patch and if it's ok would it be > >>possible to include it in the 5.10 pull? > >I don't think the op table approach would be that difficult, I'd really > >rather see that. > > I think if we do the op table approach then we should also try to solve > all other dependencies between various NFS client and server modules > and not just the SSC part. Are there any others? I'd be very surprised. It's something we've been quite careful not to do in the past. I apologize that it got past my review this time. --b. > It might be a little involved so I'd like > to take some time to research before committing to the longer solution > which I plan to do. In the mean time, this small patch allows some of > us to use the inter server copy until the long term solution is available. > > >Is this causing someone an immediate practical problem? > > This causes inter server copy to fail with any kernel build with NFS_FS=m > which I think is a common config. And it also causes compile errors if > NFSD=y, NFS_FS=y and NFS_v4=m. > > -Dai > > > > >--b. > > > >>Thanks, > >> > >>-Dai > >> > >>On 9/23/20 4:06 PM, Dai Ngo wrote: > >>>This patch provides a temporarily relief for inter copy to work with > >>>some common configs. For long term solution, I think Trond's suggestion > >>>of using fs/nfs/nfs_common to store an op table that server can use to > >>>access the client code is the way to go. > >>> > >>> fs/nfsd/Kconfig | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> > >>>Below are the results of my testing of upstream mainline without and with the fix. > >>> > >>>Upstream version used for testing: 5.9-rc5 > >>> > >>>1. Upstream mainline (existing code: NFS_FS=y) > >>> > >>> > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| NFSD | NFS_FS | NFS_V4 | RESULTS | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | y | m | Build errors: nfs42_ssc_open/close | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | m | m | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>| | | | See NOTE1. | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | m | y (m) | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>| | | | See NOTE2. | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | y | y | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>> > >>> > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| NFSD | NFS_FS | NFS_V4 | RESULTS | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | y | m | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | m | m | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | m | y (m) | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | y | y | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>> > >>>2. Upstream mainline (with the fix: !(NFSD=y && (NFS_FS=m || NFS_V4=m)) > >>> > >>> > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| NFSD | NFS_FS | NFS_V4 | RESULTS | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | y | m | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | m | m | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | m | y (m) | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| m | y | y | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>> > >>> > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| NFSD | NFS_FS | NFS_V4 | RESULTS | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | y | m | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | m | m | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | m | y (m) | Build OK, inter server copy failed with NFS4ERR_STALE | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>>| y | y | y | Build OK, inter server copy OK | > >>>|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > >>> > >>>NOTE1: > >>>BUG: When inter server copy fails with NFS4ERR_STALE, it left the file > >>>created with size of 0! > >>> > >>>NOTE2: > >>>When NFS_V4=y and NFS_FS=m, the build process automatically builds with NFS_V4=m > >>>and ignores the setting NFS_V4=y in the config file. > >>> > >>>This probably due to NFS_V4 in fs/nfs/Kconfig is configured to depend on NFS_FS. > >>>