Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 12 Oct 2020 09:19:46 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, linux-aio@kvack.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
        ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
        linux-cachefs@redhat.com, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
        xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-um@lists.infradead.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC PKS/PMEM 22/58] fs/f2fs: Utilize new kmap_thread()
Message-ID: <20201012161946.GA858@sol.localdomain>
References: <20201009195033.3208459-1-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20201009195033.3208459-23-ira.weiny@intel.com>
 <20201009213434.GA839@sol.localdomain>
 <20201010003954.GW20115@casper.infradead.org>
 <20201010013036.GD1122@sol.localdomain>
 <20201012065635.GB2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20201012065635.GB2046448@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 11:56:35PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > 
> > And I still don't really understand.  After this patchset, there is still code
> > nearly identical to the above (doing a temporary mapping just for a memcpy) that
> > would still be using kmap_atomic().
> 
> I don't understand.  You mean there would be other call sites calling:
> 
> kmap_atomic()
> memcpy()
> kunmap_atomic()

Yes, there are tons of places that do this.  Try 'git grep -A6 kmap_atomic'
and look for memcpy().

Hence why I'm asking what will be the "recommended" way to do this...
kunmap_thread() or kmap_atomic()?

> And since I don't know the call site details if there are kmap_thread() calls
> which are better off as kmap_atomic() calls I think it is worth converting
> them.  But I made the assumption that kmap users would already be calling
> kmap_atomic() if they could (because it is more efficient).

Not necessarily.  In cases where either one is correct, people might not have
put much thought into which of kmap() and kmap_atomic() they are using.

- Eric