Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:09:03 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To:     Roberto Bergantinos Corpas <rbergant@redhat.com>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: raise kernel RPC channel buffer size
Message-ID: <20201024020903.GC31481@fieldses.org>
References: <20201019093356.7395-1-rbergant@redhat.com>
 <20201019132000.GA32403@fieldses.org>
 <alpine.DEB.2.21.2010231141460.29805@ramsan.of.borg>
 <20201024000434.GA31481@fieldses.org>
 <CACWnjLw_EJBnz9ywkg=-7HVScJT1gKRmYRda1MWUrPYTWkHXzw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACWnjLw_EJBnz9ywkg=-7HVScJT1gKRmYRda1MWUrPYTWkHXzw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 03:29:25AM +0200, Roberto Bergantinos Corpas wrote:
> Good point Geert !
> 
> > How about making it a kvmalloc?
> 
> I can post a new patch using kvmalloc, Bruce looks we can also
> prescind of queue_io_mutex, what do you think ?

And revert da77005f0d64, I think. 

Maybe there's something I'm missing, but I don't think we need all that
complexity.

--b.