Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1120831pxu; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:54:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyUDRWrN7c3yv/NaxT0zkTf/3UMpHt+8p1yWpXuPmDA/BTrz6/hnL45hbB22mCAqHjDQzVY X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4e45:: with SMTP id g5mr4103693ejw.391.1609966470006; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:54:30 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609966470; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XNm/gaN0NzIS/UaLNCOqTGV0JV0F3dEaZb+S0oAqZ+T/o2jmAP5AoBx9dmU9DbzEQP EUtPwV6ViH/ksrIbwoBjAE85bacakXW1pg1L7PNh5Nzcgs9tdvTluhJsDbqeo70JMH0o UTfSbsgx5e3ak8T3axpA5EWzWjN10uhzPI4J6xXkZcWbGbYLWhSWxPk4xVhsol43qs30 vs4Hv6+nNb3BKLXF7UC4eMFIRM6U02zJBrFhRpd9dPwTcUQ397nOirmT+jI+/oVZ7XPk nxayfoG5O0sRymy1EhHAoqZcLxtOW8vdSSobq5NmCeRypwFs7zssAWolkswn+uxbd7fu kbcw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=pf+CAEQq59CbISnqHZ7qjfGChKriNCccNgZvmRVHRKg=; b=T4tZ0n/uIaGh1cGW7wDFal8dM8sby8MAnIG5KtJOHQEV2sKABPCgIwvGOqYcyvzRr4 cqw+nlPFBLAbdxrXaIMBSxIRo9QeHaEpRxfAKTC7o14sKdu/nJm7sPygMgULx8/s3YOq AAQAAt1rFEcYoS0L5u21g701IHIzWhgupuZq/Cq9Nsj6XBiI0CCL+l1tycUWgZn6Mvnn CHR5LxqN3TE34Z7XrMtm3oerLtdiNjDeKxZAgTOpxvEiYo4E6uxjfpNAihGi9bGCKwZH Jq3OvovzbMBTFNGi8/AAGvLE/zCWe4oFXf5Nj7ri2TzVdx8B/mJYzx5+LyAtptVe339n Rfqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=kPdnkXTS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id de26si1334593edb.570.2021.01.06.12.54.04; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 12:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=kPdnkXTS; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726640AbhAFUvA (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:51:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60268 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726592AbhAFUu7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:50:59 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F5BEC061575 for ; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 12:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id 9356A6191; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:50:17 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org 9356A6191 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1609966217; bh=pf+CAEQq59CbISnqHZ7qjfGChKriNCccNgZvmRVHRKg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kPdnkXTSSMegTmgJKN4Nt6t40ekaYZJ9r9YmvJL9UvVLjqxQjUzxmb2qlvt+8gaJe qRl3tVqqyPYtu4eGpT8p944nmN1oRYqElSQY8BkX9htym71DVyKwS/aJCc2MtsYPIt BHxSeHnh6uMZNj1S7e4FTOuG/UVy0MIbgFNRGD54= Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2021 15:50:17 -0500 From: "J . Bruce Fields" To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Chuck Lever , Jeff Layton , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] nfsd: protect concurrent access to nfsd stats counters Message-ID: <20210106205017.GG13116@fieldses.org> References: <20210106075236.4184-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20210106075236.4184-3-amir73il@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210106075236.4184-3-amir73il@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org These three patches seem fine. To bikeshed just a bit more: On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 09:52:35AM +0200, Amir Goldstein wrote: > /* We found a matching entry which is either in progress or done. */ > - nfsdstats.rchits++; > + nfsd_stats_rc_hits_inc(); Maybe make that something like nfsd_stats_inc(NFSD_STATS_RC_HITS); and then we could avoid boilerplate like the below? --b. > +static inline void nfsd_stats_rc_hits_inc(void) > +{ > + percpu_counter_inc(&nfsdstats.counter[NFSD_STATS_RC_HITS]); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_rc_misses_inc(void) > +{ > + percpu_counter_inc(&nfsdstats.counter[NFSD_STATS_RC_MISSES]); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_rc_nocache_inc(void) > +{ > + percpu_counter_inc(&nfsdstats.counter[NFSD_STATS_RC_NOCACHE]); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_fh_stale_inc(void) > +{ > + percpu_counter_inc(&nfsdstats.counter[NFSD_STATS_FH_STALE]); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_io_read_add(s64 amount) > +{ > + percpu_counter_add(&nfsdstats.counter[NFSD_STATS_IO_READ], amount); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_io_write_add(s64 amount) > +{ > + percpu_counter_add(&nfsdstats.counter[NFSD_STATS_IO_WRITE], amount); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_payload_misses_inc(struct nfsd_net *nn) > +{ > + percpu_counter_inc(&nn->counter[NFSD_NET_PAYLOAD_MISSES]); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_drc_mem_usage_add(struct nfsd_net *nn, s64 amount) > +{ > + percpu_counter_add(&nn->counter[NFSD_NET_DRC_MEM_USAGE], amount); > +} > + > +static inline void nfsd_stats_drc_mem_usage_sub(struct nfsd_net *nn, s64 amount) > +{ > + percpu_counter_sub(&nn->counter[NFSD_NET_DRC_MEM_USAGE], amount); > +}