Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp403064pxb; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:54:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy0rxvhujExtqerXcecFgoGla7+SEm2WSk7F8OR6NdhqnvkCBFvrOHPK68GzYvbFhPCCP3s X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8152:: with SMTP id z18mr3167121ejw.317.1610121250678; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 07:54:10 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610121250; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ujWHp1kYWLoEmtsZKPC6T+/F0yxDWrEl0k6uRY+fcoV+CeZTlRQ8ndCNaulT9hACQo ibFaIMWdPUB7t+KtXpJtUz5aF2ZZvLkaaEq3/oNF761LAfUCM6yZ+0hFkByT4rB4PK8O gfpfZ/BJSzK4YzpBQdPenaw/ZxruIDAe6y1VHVvMacoYFaWD3sF79QTnor7um6pdwlb4 kSCAq8GdmsW1+aVNLCPaMBZxRVcYwHFuo6McFNQPgUeRxVAnAVRfQDgH6uJOj9zR85oV FmpmYW1zUsr6MYkZVpZ1jyJm8LRepH9PvNHKCjPS1j3GuTr7cOkiveaobGlxk40+C7iT 2xOA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=JUSRpN0I3wHcITQ/lLH5SGF2OgykUbjK8MK+kClIcdE=; b=B11E7RC277Su/CCVQUWX1pO15ZADjqYXbswhVoboMCHsr8ij2AfbIvT62MMJe25gn9 xkgmqZ/zOyZMWNwYXDe07glR83V03cU5jpGneuQTW1plvxkD/FDae4DgtN9FgTZWlBG3 K2/UJDVGhfEjFlU9Ui88D/tAWcIMGmoCMtq6FoPieHVm/523epv1Oe3tDM3r2VU25HA1 mArHLekhMPemenjsRVIz+h9edJXcHlKG5VPmOz+0nx0SnNN5bTEB/yWMaBB3pbcms61D ZnXyg5am+FrEQYIAppB4t9WHTDMkWOPxtKI0MUzLVtdROSHe5w2haMsnsmJwj5USsXnT 2T2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=wakhb0iA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h26si3613627ejq.399.2021.01.08.07.53.45; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 07:54:10 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=wakhb0iA; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727967AbhAHPwv (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:52:51 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39522 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727182AbhAHPwu (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:52:50 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7063C061381 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 07:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id A19923C33; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:52:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org A19923C33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1610121129; bh=JUSRpN0I3wHcITQ/lLH5SGF2OgykUbjK8MK+kClIcdE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wakhb0iA2fDSqlQAWs3T74by793TfGjJyQiOpCRayV50ZgKkemDBKNb5di33C4P58 q6LJQvTqd0rdvU3DkzwJuI2bBLKFgH74p5Uz6adHEq5DMokJif3IW0/UMLnE06Qh/z y6MfOUp9v+DeZzd5nidbyWb/VZHJxpiiK4ebdky0= Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:52:09 -0500 From: Bruce Fields To: Chuck Lever Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/42] Update NFSD XDR functions Message-ID: <20210108155209.GC4183@fieldses.org> References: <160986050640.5532.16498408936966394862.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> <20210108031800.GA13604@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 10:50:09AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > > > > On Jan 7, 2021, at 10:18 PM, bfields@fieldses.org wrote: > > > > I haven't had a chance to review these, but thought I should mention I'm > > seeing a failure in xfstests generic/465 that I don't *think* is > > reproduceable before this series. Unfortunately it's intermittent, > > though, so I'm not certain yet. > > Confirming: does that failure occur with NFSv3? I've only tried it over 4.2. --b.