Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp498317pxb; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:10:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqhbRYE03Uid3upnNTOOrf057cV8SHhlRzoDN2XFX7prOdtMd03ainNLwsPVyL0CmTPtvF X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2358:: with SMTP id m24mr3381431eja.198.1610129415567; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 10:10:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610129415; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fFYy7PdtSeaEnzpx7OcQ88w8pEMWY+3Fk+mhomIkUZmIfVgFkM1gv/I/cKkKZVChIG aYlKTuJErYrJe52Dll6Ioq3Xd97fsXvPP+ySEkvymepV8TswADL2QQSEjKjcPiEypLoa tC6k2uZta1xTM/cYkeW//E+fXZl080RgYr1xazMpsgFLRzuuzs/61LZWSm2TvACdJGmT Ip2jBhxeXc6IV0dFSy4g6ZbonEZreKl/x+iEJ3Rn46+/kMo+Lt1Et5EHtHHSDLn1CTUY VglHXC0N4unz0eVA/bpfPvrEvPtf5NpAc9sxZ341iveJ3TFk/nWZMY6Md9V4KWnrB3WF HWKQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=5Im3bgmhSNF5hjc4+3bwmlqosV1VSJQfvJ8j6NPzti8=; b=jwdrd4WgZxg7MOfTIZuPFrrQCj3qOrfShQRHbfa8kSdATsTkT/9/ck6MmtH5ysHlHX NU+Ox137iLW4izkN74TdCwtlM6hxJ0oNUg7eScBXpQkNHzE6y2k21KUH2qqDz7bxnHNY ieNzlqeRv6HG80clStHszOHF9ytRFItAw4w77b01Fai0Gv6a7k7Hzv2QuE4oae1oM2YP G1MoUqfHeBjU2tnEFijL2krlpv+J3yLHMuhW6kWC8bu7J6YdWu3bFPfySeH1zJhRZif/ qwemEu1mE2rm6dItrTT3zCAaOCtG1rttHNBm/P1O9c5KqFIsr0LBKXquJ77RJudIwGUV 3PFg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b="AdO/VYR0"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d1si3878466edr.28.2021.01.08.10.09.49; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 10:10:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b="AdO/VYR0"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728610AbhAHSIw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:52 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60742 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728605AbhAHSIv (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:51 -0500 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB53FC061380 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 10:08:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id D06D26EEC; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:10 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org D06D26EEC DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1610129290; bh=5Im3bgmhSNF5hjc4+3bwmlqosV1VSJQfvJ8j6NPzti8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AdO/VYR0MWTK0tpc/tP3qYq04GJJtt5WdxDHnlf/PdiUKJDfrd6HKCmCUJEBANxNf 1USWyrCST3hfHvd77dnlcXvnMmrTZEmZVP9QCVWRMzVfHR09a9eZyu49i4bIyVyVEE ibdYTMgYLVAzeas6um5pxHlt71AGeRtdgW/CtEhU= Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 13:08:10 -0500 From: "bfields@fieldses.org" To: Trond Myklebust Cc: "chuck.lever@oracle.com" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/42] Update NFSD XDR functions Message-ID: <20210108180810.GA10654@fieldses.org> References: <160986050640.5532.16498408936966394862.stgit@klimt.1015granger.net> <20210108031800.GA13604@fieldses.org> <20210108155209.GC4183@fieldses.org> <20210108160145.GD4183@fieldses.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 04:35:50PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Just ignore generic/465. As far as NFS is concerned, the test has > utterly borked assumptions about O_DIRECT ordering. Thanks, adding to my list of tests to skip. Should we report it as an xfstests bug? (Is the test just wrong, or is this some non-standard but documented NFS behavior, or something else?) --b.