Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp4592938pxb; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:41:59 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxAUD23JqZtf5Z1edaUUNnfP/Ms5Tlpt5OVdvL0SaiNBx5plINGyUZUeAPcyMKohuZbyWjN X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2851:: with SMTP id s17mr13331746ejc.510.1613349719347; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:41:59 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613349719; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rzHaffjNPVyQg6CNeVhtKrL9my5NL0uQOoJ5veWtQTkF3yvWsWfH9n5osKJMSJhbnu 15ek92u+97E7/LLoLmdSvHbgOotAEzWDOJitslJj5ADYNzraul6Lu0GvDf8bvRAxloXl HJrQcojfdO2MPppi0+nduo0XYlindrvInHyymRIa6TgjfAkiQKJ2YR978PQQ3FCqKzNU 5o3rDJ51bVm7LhGZ9MGko7vcOANEZR5ZaubRijVGhhA50vJKFSoX6E60mKJZ1KU3hXQu s/6V1mDa/hGW3/6OnbKIHSwhjArH3H5s0HjJ+oUixDPOXmpJzveeEklIjYqcNPORh7o3 XoTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-id:mime-version:subject:cc:to:references:in-reply-to:from :organization:dkim-signature; bh=icyirenyNVPQ/6+Zc420o3Iw7zjp69we48horNqQpPg=; b=v4Hh8d5MRNApSgxelqL5T4wdZg+InZsHnaTyPnZPVoLI3CQ/HIjtuD/BtSN5k/oVoi fN2iz0fyLGNDK7W0n2lBgH2vrwVvW9YMlTNASuCVlhNtlJqyeTDvTBRUp882sLkY+71p 7ZjrOrGxRAbFowSaRtjRDd0zbdyfJtxrKZUP3tksNuIE90lZDeyBhIMOuWxXn/CZ92OJ 2sN2W2oXzmvizAruc2lDIsAtvSYWbvwmr2CnXgC527eKO/j6BOAQSXdt6xcv61kHo4xd OnHFAFa39bREtB0GC4tkQfMozFejSvphx0gNjnOw3gkBDM6tWueDb4E5mdLgcpgbbPIL c6dw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PaFpoL9g; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n20si11249205ejj.318.2021.02.14.16.41.18; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 16:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=PaFpoL9g; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229889AbhBOAYh (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 19:24:37 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:28210 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229827AbhBOAYh (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 19:24:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613348589; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=icyirenyNVPQ/6+Zc420o3Iw7zjp69we48horNqQpPg=; b=PaFpoL9gjXjZSdWXJwxt0RShkpE9i6bNrqrFBLBLQ/2PQhBKTRFA63tlbF1zB/mGyNk2Sj 7txn+36m/u/5Xz+ieCS1/ENOCzLh1u4jf/NFE2Ulaj93Gtk41AuCohbKuEbg4cDp2VqI+2 CzYWEmPTHT7PpmVGu32R7KW0QB85+4w= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-484-xtPvx-7lP1aR-4qYcHimfw-1; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 19:23:07 -0500 X-MC-Unique: xtPvx-7lP1aR-4qYcHimfw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB8D1005501; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-119-68.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.119.68]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013BD6F986; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <591237.1612886997@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1330473.1612974547@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <1330751.1612974783@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <27816.1613085646@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Matthew Wilcox , Jeff Layton , David Wysochanski , Anna Schumaker , Trond Myklebust , Steve French , Dominique Martinet , Alexander Viro , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, CIFS , linux-fsdevel , "open list:NFS, SUNRPC, AND..." , v9fs-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] fscache: I/O API modernisation and netfs helper library MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <860728.1613348577.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:22:57 +0000 Message-ID: <860729.1613348577@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > But no, it's not a replacement for actual code review after the fact. > = > If you think email has too long latency for review, and can't use > public mailing lists and cc the people who are maintainers, then I > simply don't want your patches. I think we were talking at cross-purposes by the term "development" here. = I was referring to the discussion of how the implementation should be done a= nd working closely with colleagues - both inside and outside Red Hat - to get things working, not specifically the public review side of things. It's j= ust that I don't have a complete record of the how-to-implement-it, the how-to-get-various-bits-working-together and the why-is-it-not-working? discussions. Anyway, I have posted my fscache modernisation patches multiple times for public review, I have tried to involve the wider community in aspects of t= he development on public mailing lists and I have been including the maintain= ers in to/cc. I've posted the more full patchset for public review a number of times: 4th May 2020: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/158861203563.340223.7585359869938129= 395.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ 13th Jul (split into three subsets): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/159465766378.1376105.116199762510392= 87525.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/159465784033.1376674.181064636939898= 11037.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/159465821598.1377938.204636227022500= 8168.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ 20th Nov: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/160588455242.3465195.321473385827301= 9178.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ I then cut it down and posted that publically a couple of times: 20th Jan: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/161118128472.1232039.117467998330664= 25131.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ 25th Jan: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/161161025063.2537118.200924944468224= 1405.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ I let you know what was coming here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/447452.1596109876@warthog.procyon.or= g.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/2522190.1612544534@warthog.procyon.o= rg.uk/ to try and find out whether you were going to have any objections to the design in advance, rather than at the last minute. I've apprised people of what I was up to: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/24942.1573667720@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/2758811.1610621106@warthog.procyon.o= rg.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1441311.1598547738@warthog.procyon.o= rg.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/160655.1611012999@warthog.procyon.or= g.uk/ Asked for consultation on parts of what I wanted to do: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/3326.1579019665@warthog.procyon.org.= uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/4467.1579020509@warthog.procyon.org.= uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/3577430.1579705075@warthog.procyon.o= rg.uk/ Asked someone who is actually using fscache in production to test the rewr= ite: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs/2020-December/msg00000.h= tml I've posted partial patches to try and help 9p and cifs along: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/1514086.1605697347@warthog.procyon.o= rg.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/1794123.1605713481@warthog.procyon.org.= uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/241017.1612263863@warthog.procyon.or= g.uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/270998.1612265397@warthog.procyon.org.u= k/ (Jeff has been handling Ceph and Dave NFS). Proposed conference topics related to this: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/9608.1575900019@warthog.procyon.org.= uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/14196.1575902815@warthog.procyon.org= .uk/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/364531.1579265357@warthog.procyon.or= g.uk/ though the lockdown put paid to that:-( Willy has discussed it too: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20200826193116.GU17456@casper.infrad= ead.org/ David