Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:58:56 +0200
From:   Dan Aloni <dan@kernelim.com>
To:     Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc:     Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/8] sunrpc: rename 'net' to 'client'
Message-ID: <20210217185856.guvws6rdakoqr46h@gmail.com>
References: <20210215174002.2376333-1-dan@kernelim.com>
 <20210215174002.2376333-2-dan@kernelim.com>
 <CAFX2JfkPRQ0o2BXgUhO+LEB6SBpUF5nivwAXQz5VAoH6iVTVXQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFX2JfkPRQ0o2BXgUhO+LEB6SBpUF5nivwAXQz5VAoH6iVTVXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 04:24:41PM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> Hi Dan,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 12:42 PM Dan Aloni <dan@kernelim.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is in preparation to adding a second directory to keep track
> > of each transport.
> 
> I initially named the directory "net" to match how NFS's sysfs
> directories are created (/sys/fs/nfs/net). If naming it "client" makes
> more sense then I should probably introduce it that way in my patches.
> 
> Thoughts?

We can keep the "net" directory under "sunrpc" and have the three
directories under it, i.e:

     /sys/kernel/sunrpc/net/client
     /sys/kernel/sunrpc/net/transport
     /sys/kernel/sunrpc/net/multipath

It works for me too, but I no preference either way.

-- 
Dan Aloni