Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp7476918pxb; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:03:18 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNvKOAYi9CQwtIeQuvxP8Omj6fRXpU2ElMNmuEx0qL3/wYpNOwlTg7fAvbhONnFb1DzZhi X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4707:: with SMTP id y7mr5587138ejq.79.1613674997844; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:03:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613674997; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xErR5qCb/0ZHS93vMJWsq4y415u/9jOYZp4suJA+YVoxTRrtvKYs7QMqPz1E8kEmKm SH6MwHZU2D3d3E9TYioC3WMc+vYQMzT0GxBeE5qLRHXAsZpvfYeoU0zvoPMJDHf/merI ppqqELqAPlq/GzDL5j3Be9of4SCidqYscxR875hPVaprya7jz1nAWzyB+p2VpLCaTNz9 sE1cIh+xIyr3TmBtvgnSdRgolAEbWxXYafZnH6vRotAzQ8ojJtKMHu8bGDYvi4mytWYM /sDSJF478Wblow9YvQIKHrYzAmYF6feYX0Tw/xfwhXqw6bLVkP7NPsdJmazrhXJ+zM6n 7bJg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=31FNXUTvCAV4Vxlo41pHVC06Ft+b27GYLKrDj+MrYqQ=; b=VGra+gjS6y/XnqUEkodkx0jjSaOtIeoQ47xW9z3VijFQrefTlcXVAw1mx/8vjXzLQO NtZ1qjkeXnVPqhsNoBZN6oHkflxKNMsw05DTx9k5Sms3OV/jzZzIx7Q1jF1m8vETto0W UgoVkKQJ+wqPTvJEGGwJzc04zfS1aNVSEWUUbNWdWsXtsZ6a7s+WkQcwBI6VEkU+goHT gkfxS6QPpgPGsjoeKGbxn+TtAEn40DBRxYxkewuw08G+e7OhvLcyo3xw8u6USi96MCTY swrudEb3VUj456nWkBsyYc0ayFzZ0IYFWLmfR5bAe+rAT0e/x+i35q0xYpsnWto05Yth EqOg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a1si3993865eds.208.2021.02.18.11.02.52; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 11:03:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231476AbhBRTAi (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:00:38 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36392 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233978AbhBRRR6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 12:17:58 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B9AB02B; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (brahms [local]) by brahms (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 592202e2; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:18:08 +0000 (UTC) From: Luis Henriques To: Amir Goldstein , Jeff Layton , Steve French , Miklos Szeredi , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker , Alexander Viro , "Darrick J. Wong" , Dave Chinner , Greg KH , Nicolas Boichat , Ian Lance Taylor , Luis Lozano , Andreas Dilger , Olga Kornievskaia , Christoph Hellwig Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Luis Henriques Subject: [PATCH v6] vfs: fix copy_file_range regression in cross-fs copies Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:18:06 +0000 Message-Id: <20210218171806.26930-1-lhenriques@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <87blchibaf.fsf@suse.de> References: <87blchibaf.fsf@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org A regression has been reported by Nicolas Boichat, found while using the copy_file_range syscall to copy a tracefs file. Before commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") the kernel would return -EXDEV to userspace when trying to copy a file across different filesystems. After this commit, the syscall doesn't fail anymore and instead returns zero (zero bytes copied), as this file's content is generated on-the-fly and thus reports a size of zero. This patch restores some cross-filesystem copy restrictions that existed prior to commit 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices"). Filesystems are still allowed to fall-back to the VFS generic_copy_file_range() implementation, but that has now to be done explicitly. nfsd is also modified to fall-back into generic_copy_file_range() in case vfs_copy_file_range() fails with -EOPNOTSUPP or -EXDEV. Fixes: 5dae222a5ff0 ("vfs: allow copy_file_range to copy across devices") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210212044405.4120619-1-drinkcat@chromium.org/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CANMq1KDZuxir2LM5jOTm0xx+BnvW=ZmpsG47CyHFJwnw7zSX6Q@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20210126135012.1.If45b7cdc3ff707bc1efa17f5366057d60603c45f@changeid/ Reported-by: Nicolas Boichat Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques --- And v6 is upon us. Behold! Changes since v5 - check if ->copy_file_range is NULL before calling it Changes since v4 - nfsd falls-back to generic_copy_file_range() only *if* it gets -EOPNOTSUPP or -EXDEV. Changes since v3 - dropped the COPY_FILE_SPLICE flag - kept the f_op's checks early in generic_copy_file_checks, implementing Amir's suggestions - modified nfsd to use generic_copy_file_range() Changes since v2 - do all the required checks earlier, in generic_copy_file_checks(), adding new checks for ->remap_file_range - new COPY_FILE_SPLICE flag - don't remove filesystem's fallback to generic_copy_file_range() - updated commit changelog (and subject) Changes since v1 (after Amir review) - restored do_copy_file_range() helper - return -EOPNOTSUPP if fs doesn't implement CFR - updated commit description fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 8 +++++++- fs/read_write.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c index 04937e51de56..23dab0fa9087 100644 --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ __be32 nfsd4_clone_file_range(struct nfsd_file *nf_src, u64 src_pos, ssize_t nfsd_copy_file_range(struct file *src, u64 src_pos, struct file *dst, u64 dst_pos, u64 count) { + ssize_t ret; /* * Limit copy to 4MB to prevent indefinitely blocking an nfsd @@ -578,7 +579,12 @@ ssize_t nfsd_copy_file_range(struct file *src, u64 src_pos, struct file *dst, * limit like this and pipeline multiple COPY requests. */ count = min_t(u64, count, 1 << 22); - return vfs_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0); + ret = vfs_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, count, 0); + + if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP || ret == -EXDEV) + ret = generic_copy_file_range(src, src_pos, dst, dst_pos, + count, 0); + return ret; } __be32 nfsd4_vfs_fallocate(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c index 75f764b43418..0348aaa9e237 100644 --- a/fs/read_write.c +++ b/fs/read_write.c @@ -1388,28 +1388,6 @@ ssize_t generic_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_copy_file_range); -static ssize_t do_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, - struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, - size_t len, unsigned int flags) -{ - /* - * Although we now allow filesystems to handle cross sb copy, passing - * a file of the wrong filesystem type to filesystem driver can result - * in an attempt to dereference the wrong type of ->private_data, so - * avoid doing that until we really have a good reason. NFS defines - * several different file_system_type structures, but they all end up - * using the same ->copy_file_range() function pointer. - */ - if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range && - file_out->f_op->copy_file_range == file_in->f_op->copy_file_range) - return file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, - file_out, pos_out, - len, flags); - - return generic_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len, - flags); -} - /* * Performs necessary checks before doing a file copy * @@ -1427,6 +1405,25 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, loff_t size_in; int ret; + /* + * Although we now allow filesystems to handle cross sb copy, passing + * a file of the wrong filesystem type to filesystem driver can result + * in an attempt to dereference the wrong type of ->private_data, so + * avoid doing that until we really have a good reason. NFS defines + * several different file_system_type structures, but they all end up + * using the same ->copy_file_range() function pointer. + */ + if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) { + if (file_in->f_op->copy_file_range != + file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) + return -EXDEV; + } else if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range) { + if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb != file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) + return -EXDEV; + } else { + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } + ret = generic_file_rw_checks(file_in, file_out); if (ret) return ret; @@ -1499,8 +1496,7 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, * Try cloning first, this is supported by more file systems, and * more efficient if both clone and copy are supported (e.g. NFS). */ - if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range && - file_inode(file_in)->i_sb == file_inode(file_out)->i_sb) { + if (file_in->f_op->remap_file_range) { loff_t cloned; cloned = file_in->f_op->remap_file_range(file_in, pos_in, @@ -1511,11 +1507,14 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, ret = cloned; goto done; } + /* Resort to copy_file_range if implemented. */ + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP; } - ret = do_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len, - flags); - WARN_ON_ONCE(ret == -EOPNOTSUPP); + if (file_out->f_op->copy_file_range) + ret = file_out->f_op->copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in, + file_out, pos_out, + len, flags); done: if (ret > 0) { fsnotify_access(file_in);