Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:37:12 -0500
From:   Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To:     Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc:     Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "940821@bugs.debian.org" <940821@bugs.debian.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com
Subject: Re: NFS Caching broken in 4.19.37
Message-ID: <20210221143712.GA15975@fieldses.org>
References: <5022bdc4-9f3e-9756-cbca-ada37f88ecc7@cambridgegreys.com>
 <YDFrN0rZAJBbouly@eldamar.lan>
 <af5cebbd-74c9-9345-9fe8-253fb96033f6@cambridgegreys.com>
 <BEBA9809-373A-4172-B4AD-E19D82E56DB1@oracle.com>
 <YDIkH6yVgLoALT6x@eldamar.lan>
 <9305dc03-5557-5e18-e5c9-aaf886a03fff@cambridgegreys.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9305dc03-5557-5e18-e5c9-aaf886a03fff@cambridgegreys.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 11:38:51AM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote:
> On 21/02/2021 09:13, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 08:16:26PM +0000, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>Confirming you are varying client-side kernels. Should the Linux
> >>NFS client maintainers be Cc'd?
> >
> >Ok, agreed. Let's add them as well. NFS client maintainers any ideas
> >on how to trackle this?
> 
> This is not observed with Debian backports 5.10 package
> 
> uname -a
> Linux madding 5.10.0-0.bpo.3-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.13-1~bpo10+1
> (2021-02-11) x86_64 GNU/Linux

I'm still unclear: when you say you tested a certain kernel: are you
varying the client-side kernel version, or the server side, or both at
once?

--b.