Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2426861pxb; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 02:10:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxKfBsNPVA1Fu9Hgh26PNXhe/jdR2ezYO88N8X42kIDk5NoNWqovwynUeFLBxS7d1NNkH0z X-Received: by 2002:aa7:db4f:: with SMTP id n15mr3146740edt.12.1615284617647; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:10:17 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615284617; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dO+X1bu/sbHhY6z5aJOkUUlscFRFvqz3KHUwaw55x3Ln3HRGtjh7HqQBTDA8HvfkPp 9e6YJSCTJ3Kvxmc/PSSkEoR2lDUByVNuliyV3GILfk9CbrwtP15EVFxPgtLTM9VOk2Mo 8qKhyjHfM1JwcskQyqW0D6yj/K9ywPNS/Lv3lJoE4l/DP7FFV2yOA8pZxvwBvoLEU7Ml L0seYb0/wbdxDv8O6BLANEX2a95fAqiIF8KJWLu9A1lbtd3FMjUTr8n9Px1c6MftXVcL wkVSN6KieVJe8wdtw8jBrqw25jSWePw7jz2fCxEFkNKg+IveMA4nnujs2UuHdrfESj3t 00Ow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=SYm0kgjRA7W0E7Yr2IJisxrxfRrnBadUrxfwPSBbTRk=; b=odKG8sr6ArAeuqxVIXMO8JjRl/b9Dz6/ViF6jgRtgV7OiuMLO8Y/lZLA9ArKkoby3l dB1YSLYcw7pczuAuHHu0j2tkUiawNDmFwYdyKYREII8l9vWK9keppVAYuR+r5cz6pPHu 7U8roTZynkC40e8Z6iODcpv3SGtw8TSBCJxDmuXx1QgOMPGz7lKGj0FrydLazr5Rk732 X0mfCm/tlWeTJAqBBEaxZ/RGhj+WkzyewCsjMp+bBXswTqwDlyUwl2xTeqT2BGNjWTQA yK9chK259HSoMYMv55/Y4tzXcilot4K50jhKxHvXR1MjtiGkdWZLUC8P9YHYCAIFenCi 8SLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=P4kzi0ht; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id p12si8892252ejm.633.2021.03.09.02.09.48; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:10:17 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=P4kzi0ht; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229775AbhCIKIZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:08:25 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:24696 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230045AbhCIKIP (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 05:08:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1615284495; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SYm0kgjRA7W0E7Yr2IJisxrxfRrnBadUrxfwPSBbTRk=; b=P4kzi0hta/VvcwObe2+1VpRC4JI9PLoe9Rdxg27+I6RTDgAiPdJ+IeKMqvTXKxUczVuTiK d5/Qtzq8VsEi+rrE85O869bq3gb9mqfEZle6+286XjV/Y063TbOdI3dqxbYGjTFhzKQ4Mp JkjA6JPl/vv+g/GJmxLKb07AMQfNKu8= Received: from mail-yb1-f197.google.com (mail-yb1-f197.google.com [209.85.219.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-579-w0j8nSXgPySdOOskiQ7M3A-1; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 05:08:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: w0j8nSXgPySdOOskiQ7M3A-1 Received: by mail-yb1-f197.google.com with SMTP id v62so16419249ybb.15 for ; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:08:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SYm0kgjRA7W0E7Yr2IJisxrxfRrnBadUrxfwPSBbTRk=; b=ruAHm7qV/pE1l6wH0do06mbzumD5wae/i5vmCmDGJtxOlsM/3z7ZbgSGDbAudFqM7V E0tclxXzS6KR6KpeE/+4qFQNeR5rtbXLykjsFuMbj9BJfKmQK0UoWXfboew+QK9pmyWi pNWdG1GkkflklLRGozxUarXiwbYgbzoip8s1R28SY2xPDMHyisvQfQsTrrKlae+QZbzP HKfJE4YT/m8sel5pyq1P72cMmTSQDP1XXW5TvNB1Yfqtf+tMFziw/vDuJ88xYGOrz9Ho 4Zzf1ytKNzPt/sV7fYlHtPry2pzXlh6EhZZ5yFKC7hUp4gep6vS07bSrAoALsp+6z2Ul 4jSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532qC/B5Tccw6P/6Bz3m355bj969mXXFv71sqF3SGrtF/AhSvrhv j2bQ72swS9zJCSVouZfBk4X+wljEs8kMpTyX9XaPoXj7YUbJ0aAICUigNUr4Az6ZbNO3vFG4qqd nSN7BbJiHzdIfFRjp/EBy4lij65JbAWnTleEp X-Received: by 2002:a25:ad67:: with SMTP id l39mr40282820ybe.172.1615284492512; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:08:12 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:ad67:: with SMTP id l39mr40282799ybe.172.1615284492300; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 02:08:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210115174356.408688-1-omosnace@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20210115174356.408688-1-omosnace@redhat.com> From: Ondrej Mosnacek Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 11:08:01 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4.2: fix return value of _nfs4_get_security_label() To: linux-nfs , Trond Myklebust , Anna Schumaker Cc: Linux Security Module list , SElinux list , David Quigley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:43 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > An xattr 'get' handler is expected to return the length of the value on > success, yet _nfs4_get_security_label() (and consequently also > nfs4_xattr_get_nfs4_label(), which is used as an xattr handler) returns > just 0 on success. > > Fix this by returning label.len instead, which contains the length of > the result. > > Fixes: aa9c2669626c ("NFS: Client implementation of Labeled-NFS") > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek > --- > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > index 2f4679a62712a..28465d8aada64 100644 > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > @@ -5971,7 +5971,7 @@ static int _nfs4_get_security_label(struct inode *inode, void *buf, > return ret; > if (!(fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_SECURITY_LABEL)) > return -ENOENT; > - return 0; > + return label.len; > } > > static int nfs4_get_security_label(struct inode *inode, void *buf, > -- > 2.29.2 > Ping. It's been almost 2 months now, and I can't see the patch applied anywhere, nor has it received any feedback from the NFS maintainers... Trond? Anna? -- Ondrej Mosnacek Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel Red Hat, Inc.