Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9848:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x8csp1353159pxf; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:44:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwJ4alIR202Y5okdz6dmBeRpHUrFlTKgB+M2mFZGf4TVyXhHRheVw77ixFo+wf1RDjQUMcD X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:17d6:: with SMTP id s22mr14704809edy.232.1615563871952; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:44:31 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615563871; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=s5PL5wKeA2JhxKcy/fV3onFGxkVf/HNYW5e6HcqWof+UNhctqroNOb4PC5T3qF1Glf mA1HE5Wu/M6jlevRmUpYtOEGvScuGzfTNY7tutY8ZsjDOKI/aDB63IRMTAS/U1PQ8BT3 rm+8FpRVjtP3pqjrDAcZZG9rMESmGZ8zI8QO/aVL9cVG8IFcGghxmbcYDSDM8KqnKcOi IL4HIl5UrlqVVLeTy5Nr8nbG92QiI7LDkS3ZA0HzXsizTARRq/OLKIAOSmHpxAyQd1gt JuGJ4KDjr8fL8yBZ/OkXT0fkFULdtMPiYHUnLVuyRS8k8ZZLws4qCMjOs4ezYYcJ0O+r dPuA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=yKVtxuyJN3WBJ9IZ3C8n2cwCCsnCGodTX/7iONzSVKU=; b=SvlIfpWRWS1+HGlf7idSxKHbyiwWis4E8++kI4GEV6+NJ+NkwhnBFI8h+FSOsu5t03 OqRAH/lTNKfSVb3VPdgHAYBLca1Nbm5BKv/04eYC0+pCBvnQGG4DBVWXspC2gMEAC6xF nJkCd4Pz98YGG1xsa+X7stgTyZoM3WGIseN2N+MzTHVAg/KGK08FNeg72sqqZzUtOqUE 6Yq58hlZ4axaJIRsvH/QyvBLFVP1ZzCSOKMRdFkkhMgrj7LmqPvJYOfKsYXPcSB1NEde kNgmLZKHE2Hq4B15fnRyR+vcU1+AZpZXAPbathNbSHQevPOFORUbxhW/KN1jRaZtj4A2 XudA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=netapp.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ga15si4421034ejc.24.2021.03.12.07.44.04; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:44:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=netapp.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230302AbhCLPn3 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:43:29 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f54.google.com ([209.85.208.54]:35742 "EHLO mail-ed1-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230443AbhCLPnO (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:43:14 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f54.google.com with SMTP id dm8so8587051edb.2; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:43:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=yKVtxuyJN3WBJ9IZ3C8n2cwCCsnCGodTX/7iONzSVKU=; b=q7ShJD+zfKKdacRdD0PjusKcgvk9vkpn8b3lJc3Qb15TB4iVEN4RUFyDL3lFW4pc76 7FJ41DpbO6CP6eJ/FcHw4wbaCbm2jfeeivRlXp3vYrph5vhNpJugrJRbjjAQy9iKqBfw dnmW6frYkYK+FpIBMY0z4yvtD+oPi1zslzFoitce44Ck/mDTnCXVNy/UzIraJN6sipBn L45xB35pcfrH8Ieaog4q8w8T8rxfwj8G9WhjT7Kre8uBxMHHJRwCDH2Bmm5bnYN73pk9 A5BSV/suDtTwli1xN4AjcuiCFd3a62ScdelNYts7hhtA5TJHre8O5IXmCRk2Z6SBIXgs i0cg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bvg+SpY3evRfAeRtfO1Csx3hLK4IAWnMdaZ9AYPHR4ibJd7th U7ziZh4Ex18tTwRdfW/htZUjQwznB4gBXqIpLNDovUdy X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2215:: with SMTP id cq21mr15259840edb.281.1615563792548; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:43:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210115174356.408688-1-omosnace@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Anna Schumaker Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:42:56 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFSv4.2: fix return value of _nfs4_get_security_label() To: Ondrej Mosnacek Cc: linux-nfs , Trond Myklebust , Linux Security Module list , SElinux list , David Quigley Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Hi Ondrej, On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:10 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:43 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote: > > An xattr 'get' handler is expected to return the length of the value on > > success, yet _nfs4_get_security_label() (and consequently also > > nfs4_xattr_get_nfs4_label(), which is used as an xattr handler) returns > > just 0 on success. > > > > Fix this by returning label.len instead, which contains the length of > > the result. > > > > Fixes: aa9c2669626c ("NFS: Client implementation of Labeled-NFS") > > Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek > > --- > > fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > > index 2f4679a62712a..28465d8aada64 100644 > > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c > > @@ -5971,7 +5971,7 @@ static int _nfs4_get_security_label(struct inode *inode, void *buf, > > return ret; > > if (!(fattr.valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_V4_SECURITY_LABEL)) > > return -ENOENT; > > - return 0; > > + return label.len; > > } > > > > static int nfs4_get_security_label(struct inode *inode, void *buf, > > -- > > 2.29.2 > > > > Ping. It's been almost 2 months now, and I can't see the patch applied > anywhere, nor has it received any feedback from the NFS maintainers... > Trond? Anna? Thanks for the ping! I've queued this up for the next bugfixes pull request. Anna > > -- > Ondrej Mosnacek > Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel > Red Hat, Inc. >