Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210409111254.271800-1-omosnace@redhat.com> <53c532c8-fecf-ff13-ac82-7755f11a087d@schaufler-ca.com>
In-Reply-To: <53c532c8-fecf-ff13-ac82-7755f11a087d@schaufler-ca.com>
From:   Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 19:43:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFqZXNtcMsTMDtT3pvRNp31UPGUgDzz6DPSC+uw=1LRvLrVspw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vfs/security/NFS/btrfs: clean up and fix LSM option handling
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc:     Linux Security Module list 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        SElinux list <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
        Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>,
        Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 9, 2021 at 7:00 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> On 4/9/2021 4:12 AM, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > This series attempts to clean up part of the mess that has grown around
> > the LSM mount option handling across different subsystems.
> >
> > The original motivation was to fix a NFS+SELinux bug that I found while
> > trying to get the NFS part of the selinux-testsuite [1] to work, which
> > is fixed by patch 2.
> >
> > The first patch paves the way for the second one by eliminating the
> > special case workaround in selinux_set_mnt_opts(), while also
> > simplifying BTRFS's LSM mount option handling.
> >
> > I tested the patches by running the NFS part of the SELinux testsuite
> > (which is now fully passing). I also added the pending patch for
> > broken BTRFS LSM options support with fsconfig(2) [2] and ran the
> > proposed BTRFS SELinux tests for selinux-testsuite [3] (still passing
> > with all patches).
>
> The Smack testsuite can be found at:
>         https://github.com/smack-team/smack-testsuite.git
>
> It might provide another layer of confidence.

Thanks, but that doesn't seem to exercise mounting/remounting btrfs
nor nfs with security options. Anything else should be unaffected.

>
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux-testsuite/
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/20210401065403.GA1363493@infradead.org/T/
> > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/20201103110121.53919-2-richard_c_haines@btinternet.com/
> >     ^^ the original patch no longer applies - a rebased version is here:
> >     https://github.com/WOnder93/selinux-testsuite/commit/212e76b5bd0775c7507c1996bd172de3bcbff139.patch
> >
> > Ondrej Mosnacek (2):
> >   vfs,LSM: introduce the FS_HANDLES_LSM_OPTS flag
> >   selinux: fix SECURITY_LSM_NATIVE_LABELS flag handling on double mount
> >
> >  fs/btrfs/super.c         | 35 ++++++-----------------------------
> >  fs/nfs/fs_context.c      |  6 ++++--
> >  fs/super.c               | 10 ++++++----
> >  include/linux/fs.h       |  3 ++-
> >  security/selinux/hooks.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
> >
>


-- 
Ondrej Mosnacek
Software Engineer, Linux Security - SELinux kernel
Red Hat, Inc.