Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:57:10 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To:     Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg
Message-ID: <YID0Fg3f0PzckJI9@unreal>
References: <20210407001658.2208535-1-pakki001@umn.edu>
 <YH5/i7OvsjSmqADv@kroah.com>
 <20210420171008.GB4017@fieldses.org>
 <YH+zwQgBBGUJdiVK@unreal>
 <CAFX2JfnGCbanTaGurArBw-5F2MynPD=GpwkfU6wVoNKr9ffzRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <YIAzfsMx6bn5Twu8@unreal>
 <YIBJXjCbJ1ntH1RF@mit.edu>
 <YIBiQ3p9z7y6PeqT@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YIBiQ3p9z7y6PeqT@kernel.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:34:59PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:48:46AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 05:15:26PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > This thread is the first I'm hearing about this. I wonder if there is
> > > > a good way of alerting the entire kernel community (including those
> > > > only subscribed to subsystem mailing lists) about what's going on? It
> > > > seems like useful information to have to push back against these
> > > > patches.
> 
> Heh, I've got this information from google news feed on my phone :)
>  
> > > IMHO, kernel users ML is good enough for that.
> > 
> > The problem is that LKML is too high traffic for a lot of people to
> > want to follow.
> 
> I think Leon meant kernel.org users ML (users@linux.kernel.org). Along with
> ksummut-discuss it'll reach most maintainers, IMHO.

Exactly.

Thanks

>  
> > There are some people who have used the kernel summit discuss list
> > (previously ksummit-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, now
> > ksummit@lists.linux.dev) as a place where most maintainers tend to be
> > subscribed, although that's not really a guarantee, either.  (Speaking
> > of which, how to handle groups who submit patches in bad faith a good
> > Maintainer Summit topic for someone to propose...)
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely yours,
> Mike.