Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210407001658.2208535-1-pakki001@umn.edu> <YH5/i7OvsjSmqADv@kroah.com>
 <20210420171008.GB4017@fieldses.org> <YH+zwQgBBGUJdiVK@unreal>
 <YH+7ZydHv4+Y1hlx@kroah.com> <CADVatmNgU7t-Co84tSS6VW=3NcPu=17qyVyEEtVMVR_g51Ma6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <YH/8jcoC1ffuksrf@kroah.com>
In-Reply-To: <YH/8jcoC1ffuksrf@kroah.com>
From:   Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 22 Apr 2021 09:10:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CADVatmORofURmrLiV7GRW2ZchzL6zdQopwxAh2YSVT0y69KuHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: Add a check for gss_release_msg
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
        "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Aditya Pakki <pakki001@umn.edu>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Greg,

On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:21 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:07:11AM +0100, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 6:44 AM Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 01:10:08PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:15:23AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > > If you look at the code, this is impossible to have happen.
> > > > > >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > They introduce kernel bugs on purpose. Yesterday, I took a look on 4
> > > > accepted patches from Aditya and 3 of them added various severity security
> > > > "holes".
> > >
> > > All contributions by this group of people need to be reverted, if they
> > > have not been done so already, as what they are doing is intentional
> > > malicious behavior and is not acceptable and totally unethical.  I'll
> > > look at it after lunch unless someone else wants to do it...
> >
> > A lot of these have already reached the stable trees. I can send you
> > revert patches for stable by the end of today (if your scripts have
> > not already done it).
>
> Yes, if you have a list of these that are already in the stable trees,
> that would be great to have revert patches, it would save me the extra
> effort these mess is causing us to have to do...

The patch series for all the stable branches should be with you now.

But for others:
https://lore.kernel.org/stable/YIEVGXEoeizx6O1p@debian/  for v5.11.y
and other branches are sent as a reply to that mail.


-- 
Regards
Sudip