Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: quic in-kernel implementation?
To:     Alexander Ahring Oder Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org,
        smfrench@gmail.com, Leif Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>,
        Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
References: <CAK-6q+hS29yoTF4tKq+Xt3G=_PPDi9vmFVwGPmutbsQyD2i=CA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
Message-ID: <6b4027c4-7c25-fa98-42bc-f5b3a55e1d5a@novek.ru>
Date:   Tue, 8 Jun 2021 21:51:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAK-6q+hS29yoTF4tKq+Xt3G=_PPDi9vmFVwGPmutbsQyD2i=CA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 07.06.2021 16:25, Alexander Ahring Oder Aring wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> as I notice there exists several quic user space implementations, is
> there any interest or process of doing an in-kernel implementation? I
> am asking because I would like to try out quic with an in-kernel
> application protocol like DLM. Besides DLM I've heard that the SMB
> community is also interested into such implementation.
> 
> - Alex
> 

Hi!
I'm working on test in-kernel implementation of quic. It's based on the
kernel-tls work and uses the same ULP approach to setup connection
configuration. It's mostly about offload crypto operations of short header
to kernel and use user-space implementation to deal with any other types
of packets. Hope to test it till the end of June with some help from
Jakub.
Vadim