Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 30 Jun 2021 17:40:37 +0100
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc:     Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 5.13 NFSD: completely broken?
Message-ID: <20210630164037.GE22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <20210630155325.GD22278@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <1BF34FA4-EC1A-405D-AA8B-217BF94DA219@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1BF34FA4-EC1A-405D-AA8B-217BF94DA219@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 03:55:16PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > On Jun 30, 2021, at 11:53 AM, Russell King (Oracle) <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I've just upgraded my ARM32 VMs to 5.13, and I'm seeing some really odd
> > behaviour with NFS exports that are mounted on a debian stable x86
> > machine.  Here's an example packet dump:
...
> > Has 5.13 been tested with nfsv3 ?
> > 
> > Any ideas what's going on?
> 
> Yes, fortunately!
> 
> Have a look at commit 66d9282523b for a one-liner fix, it should apply
> cleanly to v5.13.

Thanks Chuck, that resolves the issue for me.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!