Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1287:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp5048588pxv; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxxRSHC5lk+xQ7VkHc7lGibF8mam2NP3kM4VyLTthDuszBgFnd1aS9bMDSsNHczsHOtFV79 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:138b:: with SMTP id d11mr19637800ilo.229.1627461543656; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1627461543; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=hFGwndAnJ6rNAgdquD+xa7ZnYZECcZq6Yw/XpI/jnZynSC9DuoBVvRanUBFOzlnqM1 B576Lpev1bJW8yrzsWGOYga93XddnjViC2wcS4IvzlEj+4XkhQg0Pf5SaL+xs3f/w/40 HwS487nNNnoHPfplFGLN1a98Cc8C8wAQsdJGK1RhQoxTmYrjdJHEQ+TIVBr2gJPVXYYK 24TohBch7rD+YOhVXFRsSrdMH3OSb+Qae7cxd/xFZB7SpJqQvD/QWpbNgXUW6jN6siWe PoAIerMzLCIy1j/cQn+s+FdEPF58K7MlGnj8DqwvMxdR0OMDPer+wPmbQC2G+AsKLb03 5sIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=xnq2APFfstZ5hs8KURLbscJZhJWz1ZmDnIrRbJ0mbT4=; b=JXfImcUoV7iSb36IT+MX1F4aJqPBinKTwYsKoGzAC8pRCOTiAXMgVcWahnW6MzU6Hk 3gOpRFeKOLGNTJiCrX+n8h0vyCJRgUFse/OZ1Cy9aP8TnJ/VOSivLMT4E7HROLqFd3BW cZ7m+zKym/ovHwbheCD02YZjvN863V7B6j0vYjXivhKTcxc1uOZOfcYaMqLVwzg6A8X5 kgHPBtc7UfmV/HKRZefO0nKHlCFELfds9W0diqofF9+uBckZIfV8hwSl5n2O9A8vvCOs fpfFbkPRBj4PlNFiQKaOePn3kLGTxFbjMX1T2zKRGKg3lW18JMix6wX7AdoMHM1l29SG wlNw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r8si5908797jar.122.2021.07.28.01.38.40; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 01:39:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235366AbhG1IiC (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 04:38:02 -0400 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]:1100 "EHLO mga18.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234238AbhG1IiB (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jul 2021 04:38:01 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10058"; a="199835714" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,275,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="199835714" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jul 2021 01:37:59 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,275,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="663225937" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO d053b881505b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2021 01:37:57 -0700 Received: from kbuild by d053b881505b with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m8f4e-00086z-Em; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 08:37:56 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:37:28 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: NeilBrown , Christoph Hellwig , Josef Bacik , "J. Bruce Fields" , Chuck Lever , Chris Mason , David Sterba , Alexander Viro Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH] btrfs: btrfs_mountpoint_expiry_timeout can be static Message-ID: <20210728083727.GA157645@c5f9c8f3c8da> References: <162742546558.32498.1901201501617899416.stgit@noble.brown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <162742546558.32498.1901201501617899416.stgit@noble.brown> X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org fs/btrfs/inode.c:5868:5: warning: symbol 'btrfs_mountpoint_expiry_timeout' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: kernel test robot --- inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 8667a26d684d4..4f9472e41074a 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -5865,7 +5865,7 @@ static int btrfs_dentry_delete(const struct dentry *dentry) static void btrfs_expire_automounts(struct work_struct *work); static LIST_HEAD(btrfs_automount_list); static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(btrfs_automount_task, btrfs_expire_automounts); -int btrfs_mountpoint_expiry_timeout = 500 * HZ; +static int btrfs_mountpoint_expiry_timeout = 500 * HZ; static void btrfs_expire_automounts(struct work_struct *work) { struct list_head *list = &btrfs_automount_list;