Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1d13:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id pp19csp863843pxb; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:08:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxdMsiIyNc+tYYEFfwFflU05il5KdLIknbYKJCEuSr3A5dcaBfcBAjf1bTh1tqkdbqVYHJy X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:714:: with SMTP id w20mr3172482edx.62.1630022919246; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:08:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1630022919; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IeSVZ072iaS/1AfPsO/t3cYi/ddrJ9D4G7DOAqOaOjIiN2B5y1CgKqTJ0AN3aRyJbm lsNv6hmp4eG4I3DBeLdNG3GPiNEt6K2G8X6SyOmADurALPsU+Mw08bhV7jT8HcVsS/zP VFV68QJcWuubeyqIABOx5K3LeovziRnsN3ZhwSKETKdVZWR7y3X0RgCiHL5CcqtZrhRT IbITyINgwWug07wSc2tj9dsIUqb9gT9Hd6YQj6mWQiQ2Sq0s+A7fipzjBenkiwj7+6pw 802SaSmniREHXBmb597hs1zZl0AM1iQJNq1Hp7eEfj3xuAZltjzWFYcUFw88JqgJHI+D VSIQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=DO4uj42x6iwK8Wfj6i+vE2rGHAkZVFplnUc40xAqcn4=; b=TCLqh5MOOpuoxV9XavUBYQEn4AFh5VL/t2Zenzk/3FRrJ6uFd6ZEIIEsD+KSI+j1HE dzz3vgGF4BE7l2rjRHzTs6BhGjrL2v+YvEYlKZXgZU0vrHxUuaZphhYZ7JfUhMkyDVng YPxUiymHA8/Ju/4wjZ//owGrUdV5CZBpkhr6xzM+q0oh7jWmjzUTdo5tD/Y8zKFC1Pxp VpDiUuqtpN4mOSZVLJLRSE1eR/8bj4UpduWQAeDJgXB6MypRtip1FQDvntY6n13FazlP O6QspJlLcuXWWUOnGrZ+dFLWcHiShP8ubCUcQaOoby5GugB77Kxvk/gJST2QPgykNf8g ya3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BaJuPg91; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id gf2si4286268ejb.500.2021.08.26.17.08.04; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:08:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=BaJuPg91; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243766AbhH0AIu (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 20:08:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51226 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231249AbhH0AIu (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2021 20:08:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 428C8C061757 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id j1so3324140pjv.3 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DO4uj42x6iwK8Wfj6i+vE2rGHAkZVFplnUc40xAqcn4=; b=BaJuPg91wPDmyxQ0SqGyNJKxHo/sLqivt20W5mo2ORbuBLUGq8UVPGxTl05oeUydKI 9sab9iN15EdT7bxhtleIVQHwaQgL8RbSqqrbha95wkQ5A54OsqH7xJKNUQbelMEdYaTx LIfT/Gk2AIK+g7J3RbDrE4hyf74kWv3bPp9ov98AeaKCn2etUj6MMBvzHMsfAhMfmi3U Kfekxc/60a9GZikk81o79DH2v34EG65unlINgOpTDWDDm3GjMkTLxbhaXHH6T+IHSDgS 1THxGmIP4VB1BbIhtwbfWmeeR8ZGibtaZRcX0BXKBp+Qw1/4ub97wD69WHwv/PC4v8HL 1eKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DO4uj42x6iwK8Wfj6i+vE2rGHAkZVFplnUc40xAqcn4=; b=LW5WLYHrahGYpJLPK3rWNNEq0p5WxNAQmYPYX7rz8SAtjGFU5YfOmOsyE5AnrGjFLG 14HeevyZw4Sj1qHVvhQKKGFbIs2LvAbvcIS/temvSKgILrqM21H4GA9kGb2IBXZZBB4H hguvRtpT4b05Lm1avZC6UjgBlrSoDc7E8BjVRxAQNXS5SIFmbP5uttAQt0I//4Hs8d8x UEgq9XQOFmlhvqY1UnA1zz3XBRmHOrUZ+4Bik9AGxblYl44sSuwodBolZQgMa6/QPAQK Ix31ZUmlB7zW0fwMjX5gkEYKQMq2BuNh/mjGAi/2pqEvNNUKkfDHam1QDs3jCpJNZIzF cpCw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533jilmE75eLks1Cp3pIzWS5i6SyyYERiL5oYjiRwm8ZJYJPs3pH 11/RYxtJB/ycQi46KtRx/B2BeZw/bKthBh7aLsMDwZmNOBE= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:724b:b0:131:ab33:1e4e with SMTP id c11-20020a170902724b00b00131ab331e4emr5877316pll.12.1630022881573; Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:08:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <162846730406.22632.14734595494457390936@noble.neil.brown.name> <162855893202.12431.3423894387218130632@noble.neil.brown.name> <162882238416.1695.4958036322575947783@noble.neil.brown.name> <162907681945.1695.10796003189432247877@noble.neil.brown.name> <87777C39-BDDA-4E1E-83FA-5B46918A66D3@oracle.com> <162915491276.9892.7049267765583701172@noble.neil.brown.name> <162941948235.9892.6790956894845282568@noble.neil.brown.name> <162960371884.9892.13803244995043191094@noble.neil.brown.name> <162966962721.9892.5962616727949224286@noble.neil.brown.name> <163001427749.7591.7281634750945934559@noble.neil.brown.name> In-Reply-To: <163001427749.7591.7281634750945934559@noble.neil.brown.name> From: Mike Javorski Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2021 17:07:50 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NFS server regression in kernel 5.13 (tested w/ 5.13.9) To: NeilBrown Cc: Chuck Lever III , Linux NFS Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org I just tried the same mount with 4 different nfsvers values: 3, 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2 At first I thought it might be "working" because I only got freezes with 4.2 at first, but I went back and re-tested (to be sure) and got freezes with all 4 versions. So the nfsvers setting doesn't seem to have an impact. I did verify at each pass that the 'nfsvers=' value was present and correct in the mount output. FYI: another user posted on the archlinux reddit with a similar issue, I suggested they try with a 5.12 kernel and that "solved" the issue for them as well. - mike On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:44 PM NeilBrown wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2021, Mike Javorski wrote: > > I finally had the chance to test with the offloading disabled on the > > server. Unfortunately, the issues remain, may even be more frequent, > > but I can't rule out confirmation bias on that one. > > > > Not sure where to go from here. > > Have you tried NFSv3? Or 4.0? > I am (or was) leaning away from thinking it was an nfsd problem, but we > cannot rule anything out until we know that is happening. > > I plan to have another dig through the code changes today. > > NeilBrown