Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp254466pxb; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:29:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwALW55yX6ybp7w/j7fBLq94+nDh8XgLmu7XlJSYtNQ51k6Mao6K+9aAA2fzOou3dbbiXe+ X-Received: by 2002:a02:2505:: with SMTP id g5mr3277347jag.117.1631582964209; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:29:24 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1631582964; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=PGpA4z906fFmJA9OuiBy3SbX5E8pRaBfEHCPBdV4AZxsu5WSftZHqfTAWs2PGxR9dV oLz+5eTg8bqDsMTS0dsDwjofGOlfNNh9V3fG9f0kx8nyq8ax13yTdUmIN21MBUGksF4l Mb4hgrstydf4aaejYEzEQLVzEZVnMc8sHJ7/bYro/NLrhbzWUCNBVy8Vh6H5/f77nXoW vKD0aCwGsLjKHS5mCrxi4Wa0gL1b9ifoJkEzpz0L1ZdqE6P6Q5K2DFzy6/dkx6FJz2Rr msLxpPcXIiy3YPer9hQNS8U611uOSvmrUmMj4060kZdIWNjaK+tJZyQkqre88AKgJRcI F91w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:message-id:cc:subject:date:to :from:dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=kKg7RlKucOqg4kFvULlcfcgLDUa14h212dG0lQnULcE=; b=sKNPAaqmUWWngenT1lkPIlK2H9sBxzZLsqzoqlqLHZOdU94PEWYAil+YcBiiK5pUnk twSKTdtBRWMQElrvHaE5+FYnSXURiejbKPUAWDDYAbhkGpqVUqQv54gPx4sl3hgnri4l KBC3+T+PIp3gg+m2EipVG/sp1/6dzgyY1E/NaAPJpVezzrgeWhF4dx9m+Wapk9tGprRt Ir7P9G85wvDgER+6YCQivR6Yhy5Ny0AbQ0Bjj8VYZb+t4iXfqL6BM46aDy3Yn+mk4Sxa QzzYUU+q7GWeXt0SKzIOILZVQhQjwrP42edclSllDs8GAknIRwKBIjy9+3PmMLp4pYc5 e38A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=awMekhqm; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="2y/BbnOY"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n38si8303128jaf.72.2021.09.13.18.29.12; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=awMekhqm; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="2y/BbnOY"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=suse.de Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238544AbhINAaB (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:30:01 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:47790 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238446AbhINA37 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Sep 2021 20:29:59 -0400 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230D921E66; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:28:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1631579321; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kKg7RlKucOqg4kFvULlcfcgLDUa14h212dG0lQnULcE=; b=awMekhqm0ZNbe0UAJauJmcBwIc7nmh/WiO0Wm1svGCnQLjolPKb5AEyzgL6E7o+LIz4y5b lmX317K+JkPpTEpTlv/8PeWzfPTcsJIfAIpsVotoHrncS7969LnN3tar3wZGiAWm97fph1 H5B/qIkNeKC7yoT4eFeE3/rSAVYmUos= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1631579321; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kKg7RlKucOqg4kFvULlcfcgLDUa14h212dG0lQnULcE=; b=2y/BbnOYFFsEbgxZG3DjeobRaJHXJPGcoflnoSvt9f/Hntganr1MCbrR5BikDTWxDcsICr wEc7foc1STYeTIBA== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86E1A13ADE; Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id kqaiEbTsP2FYawAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Tue, 14 Sep 2021 00:28:36 +0000 From: NeilBrown To: Andrew Morton , Theodore Ts'o , Andreas Dilger , "Darrick J. Wong" , Matthew Wilcox , Mel Gorman Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 10:13:04 +1000 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] XFS: remove congestion_wait() loop from xfs_buf_alloc_pages() Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <163157838440.13293.12568710689057349786.stgit@noble.brown> In-Reply-To: <163157808321.13293.486682642188075090.stgit@noble.brown> References: <163157808321.13293.486682642188075090.stgit@noble.brown> User-Agent: StGit/0.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Documentation commment in gfp.h discourages indefinite retry loops on ENOMEM and says of __GFP_NOFAIL that it is definitely preferable to use the flag rather than opencode endless loop around allocator. congestion_wait() is indistinguishable from schedule_timeout_uninterruptible() in practice and it is not a good way to wait for memory to become available. So instead of waiting, allocate a single page using __GFP_NOFAIL, then loop around and try to get any more pages that might be needed with a bulk allocation. This single-page allocation will wait in the most appropriate way. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown --- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c index 5fa6cd947dd4..1ae3768f6504 100644 --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c @@ -372,8 +372,8 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_pages( /* * Bulk filling of pages can take multiple calls. Not filling the entire - * array is not an allocation failure, so don't back off if we get at - * least one extra page. + * array is not an allocation failure, so don't fail or fall back on + * __GFP_NOFAIL if we get at least one extra page. */ for (;;) { long last = filled; @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ xfs_buf_alloc_pages( } XFS_STATS_INC(bp->b_mount, xb_page_retries); - congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ / 50); + bp->b_pages[filled++] = alloc_page(gfp_mask | __GFP_NOFAIL); } return 0; }