Received: by 2002:a05:6a11:4021:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ky33csp1898429pxb; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEPGpup4v6LbhL3wJ07CSgpxJ/3V+6TkNv3c2YemTJVXNVQC9oIaDNiaC4eztEVp9oefWF X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d209:: with SMTP id q9mr11221503iob.206.1632519949560; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1632519949; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yeFmJ96rC7J1J2+4tbokQZXt2HfnxV03zBrAQi+39P6oKfFVSe1+wk2WLxL1x38cjG SEvZHYK5907x/JmOFTm+HpvNx7x1YCbHvQbk2sp9X118OeiI2lZOlrlcOkQ53+OTl94F ocLEpnRiLMUXYOlUOUf+IH3VmhOYlqLA//5yMKl1UdplDbvMHWtZQqs7RUl/2f+cSNZo 1u5GOI17oEbOA7TVWq5Zhlwny7bTPe32/2uJhRLXZlvyuWutga+JC3RTt3bADpsWKIZJ 7lxRGvYZS43eLpYuregBNi+f2LJhQb2qMI3BTrHXQP9YTHwfZ2OWRdzIP5LGKmYpw2Tj Femg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:from:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:date :dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=1Io4w4omTWmPoE6dVB3tp13bq9TBvzj3hfqDHBNuo54=; b=VCQrx5Fp43xrIRtDbW0FOqUK7oh8MJ3l4ud8YTc872UMoSJpohLV0FYAO5KOUr7cRb vdw+mpa29e2kPJp8EvtqM1W9Bxx6JmMI3DhnXfV+MvT5ldjzMkqvSiujkx3mx7dCostL +oV9iITGgbHXvbFO2IGUqCZRZnK4lhSQlB10LAxc4sLGG11Ve7eC7S92MPPF+2KslpNf XV3UUrjqPtmkR3881xCWwNJVQfUu22Qw/YaBOZ0xG8I6jSnzAwXm8gLOfukMezNPNtcD 2HlByEDEMsPfOk3zQTIVqtQpGLbyNL0I00Ert6ePflBrkN0BQAhh11HMWFTFBaVyIX/N QwDg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=hMcMaAhP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x13si12419280ilg.76.2021.09.24.14.45.22; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@fieldses.org header.s=default header.b=hMcMaAhP; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229974AbhIXQlX (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:41:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40306 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233932AbhIXQlW (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:41:22 -0400 Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [IPv6:2600:3c00:e000:2f7::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AC82C061613 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 09:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id A0E587044; Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:39:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 fieldses.org A0E587044 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fieldses.org; s=default; t=1632501588; bh=1Io4w4omTWmPoE6dVB3tp13bq9TBvzj3hfqDHBNuo54=; h=Date:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:From; b=hMcMaAhPaVmEHfOQxZsZ/boJQL9wNTJBethAoHB4mCeLbhBvOBl6aP5rAHUyepiR4 zRx1l87jq0vo1tAarGeCpm6lJotWWvse5YBjwQRJK9U0QhcGJkIR+7r88q9/ZzhZ37 44NMfYFXXR963Nk2Yp6HQTdRWEaWPo8hkxYVzlt0= Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:39:48 -0400 To: Kazi Anwar Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: nfs4err_delay Message-ID: <20210924163948.GB13115@fieldses.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) From: bfields@fieldses.org (J. Bruce Fields) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 03:56:23PM -0500, Kazi Anwar wrote: > We are running nfs v 4.1 on centos 7.6. > We are seeing an NFS issue where when files/dirs are deleted from a > client they are occasionally stuck at unlinkat system call(according > to strace its stuck for 100.5 secs every time). Can anyone explain > this behavior? > Running tcp dump shows nfs4err_delay status sent from the server to > the stuck client. Client and server are both centos 7.6? Is the NFS4ERR_DELAY a reponse to a REMOVE? Does /proc/locks show a delegation held on the file the client's trying to remove? --b.