Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 10:30:28 -0400
From:   Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc:     Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
        Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineering.com>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trondmy@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CPU stall, eventual host hang with BTRFS + NFS under heavy load
Message-ID: <20211011143028.GB22387@fieldses.org>
References: <281642234.3818.1625478269194.JavaMail.zimbra@raptorengineeringinc.com>
 <162855621114.22632.14151019687856585770@noble.neil.brown.name>
 <20210812144428.GA9536@fieldses.org>
 <162880418532.15074.7140645794203395299@noble.neil.brown.name>
 <YWCpnsdVqssFaLrf@aion.usersys.redhat.com>
 <589AFA4F-DF8E-45A3-8299-54E820E33169@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <589AFA4F-DF8E-45A3-8299-54E820E33169@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 05:33:18PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Oct 8, 2021, at 4:27 PM, Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2021, NeilBrown wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 13 Aug 2021, J.  Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:43:31AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> The problem here appears to be that a signalled task is being retried
> >>>> without clearing the SIGNALLED flag.  That is causing the infinite loop
> >>>> and the soft lockup.
> >>>> 
> >>>> This bug appears to have been introduced in Linux 5.2 by
> >>>> Commit: ae67bd3821bb ("SUNRPC: Fix up task signalling")
> >>> 
> >>> I wonder how we arrived here.  Does it require that an rpc task returns
> >>> from one of those rpc_delay() calls just as rpc_shutdown_client() is
> >>> signalling it?  That's the only way async tasks get signalled, I think.
> >> 
> >> I don't think "just as" is needed.
> >> I think it could only happen if rpc_shutdown_client() were called when
> >> there were active tasks - presumably from nfsd4_process_cb_update(), but
> >> I don't know the callback code well.
> >> If any of those active tasks has a ->done handler which might try to
> >> reschedule the task when tk_status == -ERESTARTSYS, then you get into
> >> the infinite loop.
> > 
> > This thread seems to have fizzled out, but I'm pretty sure I hit this
> > during the Virtual Bakeathon yesterday.  My server was unresponsive but
> > I eventually managed to get a vmcore.
> > 
> > [182411.119788] receive_cb_reply: Got unrecognized reply: calldir 0x1 xpt_bc_xprt 00000000f2f40905 xid 5d83adfb
> > [182437.775113] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 26s! [kworker/u4:1:216458]
> > [182437.775633] Modules linked in: nfs_layout_flexfiles nfsv3 nfs_layout_nfsv41_files bluetooth ecdh_generic ecc rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsv4 dns_resolver nfs fscache netfs rpcrdma rdma_cm iw_cm ib_cm ib_core tun rfkill nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib isofs cdrom nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set nf_tables nfnetlink xfs intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common libcrc32c kvm_intel qxl kvm drm_ttm_helper ttm drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops irqbypass cec joydev virtio_balloon pcspkr i2c_piix4 nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd grace sunrpc drm fuse ext4 mbcache jbd2 ata_generic crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel virtio_net serio_raw ata_piix net_failover libata virtio_blk virtio_scsi failover dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod
> > [182437.780157] CPU: 1 PID: 216458 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 5.14.0-5.el9.x86_64 #1
> > [182437.780894] Hardware name: DigitalOcean Droplet, BIOS 20171212 12/12/2017
> > [182437.781567] Workqueue: rpciod rpc_async_schedule [sunrpc]
> > [182437.782500] RIP: 0010:try_to_grab_pending+0x12/0x160
> > [182437.783104] Code: e7 e8 72 f3 ff ff e9 6e ff ff ff 48 89 df e8 65 f3 ff ff eb b7 0f 1f 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 d5 53 48 89 fb 9c <58> fa 48 89 02 40 84 f6 0f 85 92 00 00 00 f0 48 0f ba 2b 00 72 09
> > [182437.784261] RSP: 0018:ffffb5b24066fd30 EFLAGS: 00000246
> > [182437.785052] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffffffc05e0768 RCX: 00000000000007d0
> > [182437.785760] RDX: ffffb5b24066fd60 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffffc05e0768
> > [182437.786399] RBP: ffffb5b24066fd60 R08: ffffffffc05e0708 R09: ffffffffc05e0708
> > [182437.787010] R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000003 R12: ffffffffc05e0768
> > [182437.787621] R13: ffff9daa40312400 R14: 00000000000007d0 R15: 0000000000000000
> > [182437.788235] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9daa5bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [182437.788859] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [182437.789483] CR2: 00007f8f73d5d828 CR3: 000000008a010003 CR4: 00000000001706e0
> > [182437.790188] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> > [182437.790831] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> > [182437.791522] Call Trace:
> > [182437.792183]  mod_delayed_work_on+0x3c/0x90
> > [182437.792866]  __rpc_sleep_on_priority_timeout+0x107/0x110 [sunrpc]
> > [182437.793553]  rpc_delay+0x56/0x90 [sunrpc]
> > [182437.794236]  nfsd4_cb_sequence_done+0x202/0x290 [nfsd]
> > [182437.794910]  nfsd4_cb_done+0x18/0xf0 [nfsd]
> > [182437.795974]  rpc_exit_task+0x58/0x100 [sunrpc]
> > [182437.796955]  ? rpc_do_put_task+0x60/0x60 [sunrpc]
> > [182437.797645]  __rpc_execute+0x5e/0x250 [sunrpc]
> > [182437.798375]  rpc_async_schedule+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc]
> > [182437.799043]  process_one_work+0x1e6/0x380
> > [182437.799703]  worker_thread+0x53/0x3d0
> > [182437.800393]  ? process_one_work+0x380/0x380
> > [182437.801029]  kthread+0x10f/0x130
> > [182437.801686]  ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40
> > [182437.802333]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > 
> > The process causing the soft lockup warnings:
> > 
> > crash> set 216458
> >    PID: 216458
> > COMMAND: "kworker/u4:1"
> >   TASK: ffff9da94281e200  [THREAD_INFO: ffff9da94281e200]
> >    CPU: 0
> >  STATE: TASK_RUNNING (ACTIVE)
> > crash> bt
> > PID: 216458  TASK: ffff9da94281e200  CPU: 0   COMMAND: "kworker/u4:1"
> > #0 [fffffe000000be50] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffb3055c31
> > #1 [fffffe000000be58] nmi_handle at ffffffffb30268f8
> > #2 [fffffe000000bea0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffb3a36d42
> > #3 [fffffe000000bec8] exc_nmi at ffffffffb3a36f49
> > #4 [fffffe000000bef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffb3c013cb
> >    [exception RIP: add_timer]
> >    RIP: ffffffffb317c230  RSP: ffffb5b24066fd58  RFLAGS: 00000046
> >    RAX: 000000010b3585fc  RBX: 0000000000000000  RCX: 00000000000007d0
> >    RDX: ffffffffc05e0768  RSI: ffff9daa40312400  RDI: ffffffffc05e0788
> >    RBP: 0000000000002000   R8: ffffffffc05e0770   R9: ffffffffc05e0788
> >    R10: 0000000000000003  R11: 0000000000000003  R12: ffffffffc05e0768
> >    R13: ffff9daa40312400  R14: 00000000000007d0  R15: 0000000000000000
> >    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
> > --- <NMI exception stack> ---
> > #5 [ffffb5b24066fd58] add_timer at ffffffffb317c230
> > #6 [ffffb5b24066fd58] mod_delayed_work_on at ffffffffb3103247
> > #7 [ffffb5b24066fd98] __rpc_sleep_on_priority_timeout at ffffffffc0580547 [sunrpc]
> > #8 [ffffb5b24066fdc8] rpc_delay at ffffffffc0589ed6 [sunrpc]
> > #9 [ffffb5b24066fde8] nfsd4_cb_sequence_done at ffffffffc06731b2 [nfsd]
> > #10 [ffffb5b24066fe10] nfsd4_cb_done at ffffffffc0673258 [nfsd]
> > #11 [ffffb5b24066fe30] rpc_exit_task at ffffffffc05800a8 [sunrpc]
> > #12 [ffffb5b24066fe40] __rpc_execute at ffffffffc0589fee [sunrpc]
> > #13 [ffffb5b24066fe70] rpc_async_schedule at ffffffffc058a209 [sunrpc]
> > #14 [ffffb5b24066fe88] process_one_work at ffffffffb31026c6
> > #15 [ffffb5b24066fed0] worker_thread at ffffffffb31028b3
> > #16 [ffffb5b24066ff10] kthread at ffffffffb310960f
> > #17 [ffffb5b24066ff50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffb30034f2
> > 
> > Looking at the rpc_task being executed:
> > 
> > crash> rpc_task.tk_status,tk_callback,tk_action,tk_runstate,tk_client,tk_flags ffff9da94120bd00
> >  tk_status = 0x0
> >  tk_callback = 0xffffffffc057bc60 <__rpc_atrun>
> >  tk_action = 0xffffffffc0571f20 <call_start>
> >  tk_runstate = 0x47
> >  tk_client = 0xffff9da958909c00
> >  tk_flags = 0x2281
> > 
> > tk_runstate has the following flags set: RPC_TASK_SIGNALLED, RPC_TASK_ACTIVE,
> > RPC_TASK_QUEUED, and RPC_TASK_RUNNING.
> > 
> > tk_flags is RPC_TASK_NOCONNECT|RPC_TASK_SOFT|RPC_TASK_DYNAMIC|RPC_TASK_ASYNC.
> > 
> > There's another kworker thread calling rpc_shutdown_client() via
> > nfsd4_process_cb_update():
> > 
> > crash> bt 0x342a3
> > PID: 213667  TASK: ffff9daa4fde9880  CPU: 1   COMMAND: "kworker/u4:4"
> > #0 [ffffb5b24077bbe0] __schedule at ffffffffb3a40ec6
> > #1 [ffffb5b24077bc60] schedule at ffffffffb3a4124c
> > #2 [ffffb5b24077bc78] schedule_timeout at ffffffffb3a45058
> > #3 [ffffb5b24077bcd0] rpc_shutdown_client at ffffffffc056fbb3 [sunrpc]
> > #4 [ffffb5b24077bd20] nfsd4_process_cb_update at ffffffffc0672c6c [nfsd]
> > #5 [ffffb5b24077be68] nfsd4_run_cb_work at ffffffffc0672f0f [nfsd]
> > #6 [ffffb5b24077be88] process_one_work at ffffffffb31026c6
> > #7 [ffffb5b24077bed0] worker_thread at ffffffffb31028b3
> > #8 [ffffb5b24077bf10] kthread at ffffffffb310960f
> > #9 [ffffb5b24077bf50] ret_from_fork at ffffffffb30034f2
> > 
> > The rpc_clnt being shut down is:
> > 
> > crash> nfs4_client.cl_cb_client ffff9daa454db808
> >  cl_cb_client = 0xffff9da958909c00
> > 
> > Which is the same as the tk_client for the rpc_task being executed by the
> > thread triggering the soft lockup warnings.
> 
> I've seen a similar issue before.
> 
> There is a race between shutting down the client (which kills
> running RPC tasks) and some process starting another RPC task
> under this client.

Neil's analysis looked pretty convincing:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nfs/589AFA4F-DF8E-45A3-8299-54E820E33169@oracle.com/T/#m9c84d4c8f71422f4f10b1e4b0fae442af449366a

Assuming this is the same thing--he thought it was a regression due to
ae67bd3821bb ("SUNRPC: Fix up task signalling").  I'm not sure if the
bug is in that patch or if it's uncovering a preexisting bug in how nfsd
reschedules callbacks.

--b.