MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20211217215046.40316-1-trondmy@kernel.org> <20211217215046.40316-2-trondmy@kernel.org>
 <20211217215046.40316-3-trondmy@kernel.org> <20211217215046.40316-4-trondmy@kernel.org>
 <20211217215046.40316-5-trondmy@kernel.org> <20211217215046.40316-6-trondmy@kernel.org>
 <CAPL3RVFaWgdWQnWOe5B_6=1pNGSOZXp=SVFOBs24aucXphi6wQ@mail.gmail.com> <3A406AE7-B088-4618-9FA1-63BA6E939578@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A406AE7-B088-4618-9FA1-63BA6E939578@oracle.com>
From:   Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Dec 2021 17:25:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAPL3RVEXSa4RaWoOfC3dkcYm4k0pt72Cq2NNaShHr+5rZQjykg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] nfsd: NFSv3 should allow zero length writes
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc:     "trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>,
        Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 1:42 PM Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
> But it seems to me WRT4 should already tickle any problems
> with nfsd_vfs_write(), shouldn't it?

I was just taking Trond's word that this is NFSv3-specific, but it's
not clear to me why from the code, and I know that WRT4 is passing.
Something's weird.  I'm travelling or I'd test it.

--b.