Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
To:     chuck.lever@oracle.com, bfields@fieldses.org
Cc:     jlayton@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 2/3] fs/lock: only call lm_breaker_owns_lease if there is conflict.
Date:   Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:39:32 -0800
Message-Id: <1643398773-29149-3-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <1643398773-29149-1-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
References: <1643398773-29149-1-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

Modify leases_conflict to call lm_breaker_owns_lease only if
there is real conflict.  This is to allow the lock manager to
resolve the conflict if possible.

Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
---
 fs/locks.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index 052b42cc7f25..456717873cff 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -1357,9 +1357,6 @@ static bool leases_conflict(struct file_lock *lease, struct file_lock *breaker)
 {
 	bool rc;
 
-	if (lease->fl_lmops->lm_breaker_owns_lease
-			&& lease->fl_lmops->lm_breaker_owns_lease(lease))
-		return false;
 	if ((breaker->fl_flags & FL_LAYOUT) != (lease->fl_flags & FL_LAYOUT)) {
 		rc = false;
 		goto trace;
@@ -1370,6 +1367,9 @@ static bool leases_conflict(struct file_lock *lease, struct file_lock *breaker)
 	}
 
 	rc = locks_conflict(breaker, lease);
+	if (rc && lease->fl_lmops->lm_breaker_owns_lease &&
+		lease->fl_lmops->lm_breaker_owns_lease(lease))
+		rc = false;
 trace:
 	trace_leases_conflict(rc, lease, breaker);
 	return rc;
-- 
2.9.5