Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
To:     chuck.lever@oracle.com, bfields@fieldses.org
Cc:     jlayton@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v23 5/7] fs/lock: add 2 callbacks to lock_manager_operations to resolve conflict
Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 00:06:33 -0700
Message-Id: <1651129595-6904-6-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <1651129595-6904-1-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
References: <1651129595-6904-1-git-send-email-dai.ngo@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

Add 2 new callbacks, lm_lock_expirable and lm_expire_lock, to
lock_manager_operations to allow the lock manager to take appropriate
action to resolve the lock conflict if possible.

A new field, lm_mod_owner, is also added to lock_manager_operations.
The lm_mod_owner is used by the fs/lock code to make sure the lock
manager module such as nfsd, is not freed while lock conflict is being
resolved.

lm_lock_expirable checks and returns true to indicate that the lock
conflict can be resolved else return false. This callback must be
called with the flc_lock held so it can not block.

lm_expire_lock is called to resolve the lock conflict if the returned
value from lm_lock_expirable is true. This callback is called without
the flc_lock held since it's allowed to block. Upon returning from
this callback, the lock conflict should be resolved and the caller is
expected to restart the conflict check from the beginnning of the list.

Lock manager, such as NFSv4 courteous server, uses this callback to
resolve conflict by destroying lock owner, or the NFSv4 courtesy client
(client that has expired but allowed to maintains its states) that owns
the lock.

Signed-off-by: Dai Ngo <dai.ngo@oracle.com>
---
 Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst |  4 ++++
 fs/locks.c                            | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 include/linux/fs.h                    |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
index c26d854275a0..0997a258361a 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/locking.rst
@@ -428,6 +428,8 @@ prototypes::
 	void (*lm_break)(struct file_lock *); /* break_lease callback */
 	int (*lm_change)(struct file_lock **, int);
 	bool (*lm_breaker_owns_lease)(struct file_lock *);
+        bool (*lm_lock_expirable)(struct file_lock *);
+        void (*lm_expire_lock)(void);
 
 locking rules:
 
@@ -439,6 +441,8 @@ lm_grant:		no		no			no
 lm_break:		yes		no			no
 lm_change		yes		no			no
 lm_breaker_owns_lease:	yes     	no			no
+lm_lock_expirable	yes		no			no
+lm_expire_lock		no		no			yes
 ======================	=============	=================	=========
 
 buffer_head
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index c369841ef7d1..d48c3f455657 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -896,6 +896,37 @@ static bool flock_locks_conflict(struct file_lock *caller_fl,
 	return locks_conflict(caller_fl, sys_fl);
 }
 
+static bool
+resolve_lock_conflict_locked(struct file_lock_context *ctx,
+			struct file_lock *cfl, bool rwsem)
+{
+	void *owner;
+	bool ret;
+	void (*func)(void);
+
+	if (cfl->fl_lmops && cfl->fl_lmops->lm_lock_expirable &&
+				cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock) {
+		ret = (*cfl->fl_lmops->lm_lock_expirable)(cfl);
+		if (!ret)
+			return false;
+		owner = cfl->fl_lmops->lm_mod_owner;
+		if (!owner)
+			return false;
+		func = cfl->fl_lmops->lm_expire_lock;
+		__module_get(owner);
+		if (rwsem)
+			percpu_up_read(&file_rwsem);
+		spin_unlock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+		(*func)();
+		module_put(owner);
+		if (rwsem)
+			percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
+		spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+		return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 void
 posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
 {
@@ -910,11 +941,14 @@ posix_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+retry:
 	list_for_each_entry(cfl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
-		if (posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl)) {
-			locks_copy_conflock(fl, cfl);
-			goto out;
-		}
+		if (!posix_locks_conflict(fl, cfl))
+			continue;
+		if (resolve_lock_conflict_locked(ctx, cfl, false))
+			goto retry;
+		locks_copy_conflock(fl, cfl);
+		goto out;
 	}
 	fl->fl_type = F_UNLCK;
 out:
@@ -1108,6 +1142,7 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
 
 	percpu_down_read(&file_rwsem);
 	spin_lock(&ctx->flc_lock);
+retry:
 	/*
 	 * New lock request. Walk all POSIX locks and look for conflicts. If
 	 * there are any, either return error or put the request on the
@@ -1117,6 +1152,8 @@ static int posix_lock_inode(struct inode *inode, struct file_lock *request,
 		list_for_each_entry(fl, &ctx->flc_posix, fl_list) {
 			if (!posix_locks_conflict(request, fl))
 				continue;
+			if (resolve_lock_conflict_locked(ctx, fl, true))
+				goto retry;
 			if (conflock)
 				locks_copy_conflock(conflock, fl);
 			error = -EAGAIN;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index b8ed7f974fb4..aa6c1bbdb8c4 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@ struct file_lock_operations {
 };
 
 struct lock_manager_operations {
+	void *lm_mod_owner;
 	fl_owner_t (*lm_get_owner)(fl_owner_t);
 	void (*lm_put_owner)(fl_owner_t);
 	void (*lm_notify)(struct file_lock *);	/* unblock callback */
@@ -1037,6 +1038,8 @@ struct lock_manager_operations {
 	int (*lm_change)(struct file_lock *, int, struct list_head *);
 	void (*lm_setup)(struct file_lock *, void **);
 	bool (*lm_breaker_owns_lease)(struct file_lock *);
+	bool (*lm_lock_expirable)(struct file_lock *cfl);
+	void (*lm_expire_lock)(void);
 };
 
 struct lock_manager {
-- 
2.9.5