Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 19 May 2022 09:53:11 -0400
From:   "bfields@fieldses.org" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To:     Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>
Cc:     Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>,
        "trondmy@kernel.org" <trondmy@kernel.org>,
        "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Allow nfs4-acl-tools to access 'dacl' and 'sacl'
Message-ID: <20220519135311.GC23564@fieldses.org>
References: <20220514144436.4298-1-trondmy@kernel.org>
 <20220515015946.GB30004@fieldses.org>
 <15c4602658aff025b6d84e2b9461378930cbd802.camel@hammerspace.com>
 <627133c7-dab9-db0b-5fdf-ecb95820e76a@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <627133c7-dab9-db0b-5fdf-ecb95820e76a@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 09:47:41AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/14/22 11:23 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >On Sat, 2022-05-14 at 21:59 -0400, J.Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 10:44:30AM -0400, trondmy@kernel.org wrote:
> >>>From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
> >>>
> >>>The following patch set matches the kernel patches to allow access
> >>>to
> >>>the NFSv4.1 'dacl' and 'sacl' attributes. The current patches are
> >>>very
> >>>basic, adding support for encoding/decoding the new attributes only
> >>>when
> >>>the user specifies the '--dacl' or '--sacl' flags on the command
> >>>line.
> >>
> >>Seems like a reasonable thing to do.
> >>
> >>I'd rather not be responsible for nfs4-acl-tools any longer, though.
> >>
> >>--b.
> >
> >I suspected that might be the case, but since you haven't made any
> >announcements about anybody else taking over, I figured I'd start by
> >sending these to you.
> >
> >So who should take over the nfs4-acl-tools maintainer role? Is that
> >something Red Hat might be interested in doing, or should I volunteer
> >to do it while we wait for somebody to get so fed up that they decide
> >to step in?
> >
> Yeah... it probably something we should take over....
> 
> I'll add these to my todo list... Where does the upstream repo
> live today?

The Fedora rpm package points to my repo on linux-nfs.  So you can just
clone that and update the spec files to point at your repo.

--b.