Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:18 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:18;
Date:   Mon, 23 May 2022 10:31:30 -0400
From:   bfields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To:     Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc:     linux-nfs <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>, david <david@sigma-star.at>,
        luis turcitu <luis.turcitu@appsbroker.com>,
        david young <david.young@appsbroker.com>,
        david oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at>,
        trond myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>,
        anna schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
        Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>,
        chris chilvers <chris.chilvers@appsbroker.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] nfs-utils: Improving NFS re-exports
Message-ID: <20220523143130.GC24163@fieldses.org>
References: <20220502085045.13038-1-richard@nod.at>
 <20220502161713.GI30550@fieldses.org>
 <1149772405.87856.1653292425664.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1149772405.87856.1653292425664.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 09:53:45AM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Von: "bfields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
> > Anyway, basically sounds reasonable to me.  I'll try to give it a proper
> > review sometime, feel free to bug me if I don't get to it in a week or
> > so.
> 
> *kind ping* :-)

Anyway, yeah, still planning to, but I have a few other things I wanted
to get out of the way first.

--b.