Received: by 2002:a6b:fb09:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id h9csp700138iog; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrYGkaeErYtqpO6zC84d4QaKlddkFiqh4vgAvrW5H6m/V0C5sxK+HyCGjKzLePKR0CGpU0 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:4c44:b0:1e8:6ed8:db56 with SMTP id np4-20020a17090b4c4400b001e86ed8db56mr17053621pjb.202.1655143053774; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1655143053; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Sr1sdy0YlH162kcvxtIeyd3BFYNgvT9wYUVkiXVfZ1bVo7yRXExkh/GBnTCIaqKzry pl09iLwZGU/P6bBJglOSgkyqYcJhpHxIUjxODXpthyJP2p9rejKD5tgAGMQ73AqnXjfb wgrWtZACTa4lvdKCztXzy3a9tf/jk3wSg9jvh/OU+p+dUDrFtkL7b6ykJ8l+0lZd3y5m NPGgQzPBGhk3TFcYDSE7UzsBP9Y0zzxWV8vtL+m7q49S8dtKWt7qL9CiuYrVXZLHDsik qlMORurzaNydUVauOj3yZ+6r92t4eRI+BpGpJM/HNrko55iUMX7+xrJpmpEZf5jTj9zN 57+w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=6qhy4E8DRGh0mW5qQ6vXjS66jet/9Dj6BAup48rZTn4=; b=fn9rOyou/H+24xmxjuW8i3PYv55r9tK98lHsbKTfRoiRV07cRXWnLNe9Qn1utvMpLC keyIC0kyr+4JXtMhnDHqi04l/U/QhuihgPa5oRU3M/78NVsR/2tXuQ5gT1f5R3rvTqHm kh4zPjfnZ1LzO/3A+Kz1bOOvpnFEylPT9weqAM3RE14O10C7dX9OhTpmSyLMJfJF17if Q5eTNUkxEFDAAkuO1ejpRpmWprXZTVwI0Ecp+RRSnjeaPLmMl0N5a+gv0kYlvPyhKTjc zI5Wqs8+MPS3X8M4wF704kUNgFQpvvJcqhNMHmWug3Nut10CkpJ4dCGPEBVvSHtVdPHU vGjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=F4zUDDxJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j71-20020a638b4a000000b003f61dd69a6dsi9639946pge.863.2022.06.13.10.57.08; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 10:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=F4zUDDxJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231361AbiFMR4C (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:56:02 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33870 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S239750AbiFMRyp (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:54:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3992DD9 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 06:40:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1655127610; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6qhy4E8DRGh0mW5qQ6vXjS66jet/9Dj6BAup48rZTn4=; b=F4zUDDxJqnEu15PegbK/hLKVMrjlXwX5cNtC6ti83uaddr44QEpITcTPLiQLQE++HAKWd/ jf7XUIneaVxXK+sJ7WTVyYImXzhT1D763ze+ObMny5ycaHJKWNHl62Qg0fe3tWDfSLV698 Y8xQcFSR7Kd7YBdkhlOSom7hwZt94/0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-606-k2me43KINyimTpTzcUZYtw-1; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 09:40:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: k2me43KINyimTpTzcUZYtw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5763A380670E; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bcodding.csb (ovpn-0-23.rdu2.redhat.com [10.22.0.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390762026D2D; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 13:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bcodding.csb (Postfix, from userid 24008) id 93F8710C30E0; Mon, 13 Jun 2022 09:40:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Benjamin Coddington To: chuck.lever@oracle.com, trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna@kernel.org Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] NLM: Defend against file_lock changes after vfs_test_lock() Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 09:40:06 -0400 Message-Id: <9688295e35c07d3b3d6c71970b6996348c2d8f1e.1654798464.git.bcodding@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Instead of trusting that struct file_lock returns completely unchanged after vfs_test_lock() when there's no conflicting lock, stash away our nlm_lockowner reference so we can properly release it for all cases. This defends against another file_lock implementation overwriting fl_owner when the return type is F_UNLCK. Reported-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas Tested-by: Roberto Bergantinos Corpas Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington --- fs/lockd/svc4proc.c | 4 +++- fs/lockd/svclock.c | 10 +--------- fs/lockd/svcproc.c | 5 ++++- include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 1 + 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c index 176b468a61c7..4f247ab8be61 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ __nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp) struct nlm_args *argp = rqstp->rq_argp; struct nlm_host *host; struct nlm_file *file; + struct nlm_lockowner *test_owner; __be32 rc = rpc_success; dprintk("lockd: TEST4 called\n"); @@ -96,6 +97,7 @@ __nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp) if ((resp->status = nlm4svc_retrieve_args(rqstp, argp, &host, &file))) return resp->status == nlm_drop_reply ? rpc_drop_reply :rpc_success; + test_owner = argp->lock.fl.fl_owner; /* Now check for conflicting locks */ resp->status = nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, host, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie); if (resp->status == nlm_drop_reply) @@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ __nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp) else dprintk("lockd: TEST4 status %d\n", ntohl(resp->status)); - nlmsvc_release_lockowner(&argp->lock); + nlmsvc_put_lockowner(test_owner); nlmsvc_release_host(host); nlm_release_file(file); return rc; diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c index cb3658ab9b7a..9c1aa75441e1 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ nlmsvc_get_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *lockowner) return lockowner; } -static void nlmsvc_put_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *lockowner) +void nlmsvc_put_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *lockowner) { if (!refcount_dec_and_lock(&lockowner->count, &lockowner->host->h_lock)) return; @@ -590,7 +590,6 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file, int error; int mode; __be32 ret; - struct nlm_lockowner *test_owner; dprintk("lockd: nlmsvc_testlock(%s/%ld, ty=%d, %Ld-%Ld)\n", nlmsvc_file_inode(file)->i_sb->s_id, @@ -604,9 +603,6 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file, goto out; } - /* If there's a conflicting lock, remember to clean up the test lock */ - test_owner = (struct nlm_lockowner *)lock->fl.fl_owner; - mode = lock_to_openmode(&lock->fl); error = vfs_test_lock(file->f_file[mode], &lock->fl); if (error) { @@ -635,10 +631,6 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file, conflock->fl.fl_end = lock->fl.fl_end; locks_release_private(&lock->fl); - /* Clean up the test lock */ - lock->fl.fl_owner = NULL; - nlmsvc_put_lockowner(test_owner); - ret = nlm_lck_denied; out: return ret; diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c index 4dc1b40a489a..b09ca35b527c 100644 --- a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c +++ b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ __nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp) struct nlm_args *argp = rqstp->rq_argp; struct nlm_host *host; struct nlm_file *file; + struct nlm_lockowner *test_owner; __be32 rc = rpc_success; dprintk("lockd: TEST called\n"); @@ -125,6 +126,8 @@ __nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp) if ((resp->status = nlmsvc_retrieve_args(rqstp, argp, &host, &file))) return resp->status == nlm_drop_reply ? rpc_drop_reply :rpc_success; + test_owner = argp->lock.fl.fl_owner; + /* Now check for conflicting locks */ resp->status = cast_status(nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, host, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie)); if (resp->status == nlm_drop_reply) @@ -133,7 +136,7 @@ __nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_res *resp) dprintk("lockd: TEST status %d vers %d\n", ntohl(resp->status), rqstp->rq_vers); - nlmsvc_release_lockowner(&argp->lock); + nlmsvc_put_lockowner(test_owner); nlmsvc_release_host(host); nlm_release_file(file); return rc; diff --git a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h index fcef192e5e45..70ce419e2709 100644 --- a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h +++ b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h @@ -292,6 +292,7 @@ void nlmsvc_locks_init_private(struct file_lock *, struct nlm_host *, pid_t); __be32 nlm_lookup_file(struct svc_rqst *, struct nlm_file **, struct nlm_lock *); void nlm_release_file(struct nlm_file *); +void nlmsvc_put_lockowner(struct nlm_lockowner *); void nlmsvc_release_lockowner(struct nlm_lock *); void nlmsvc_mark_resources(struct net *); void nlmsvc_free_host_resources(struct nlm_host *); -- 2.31.1