Received: by 2002:a05:6359:c8b:b0:c7:702f:21d4 with SMTP id go11csp395983rwb; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:34:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM416Nf0hvZDJV17JyH5ILmVEHpHajqJgP9S0zLztK373ogwXIchJlspGgSaDmkpKOGdMlU9 X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2582:b0:176:9ba8:3c9f with SMTP id jb2-20020a170903258200b001769ba83c9fmr20709900plb.87.1664174073345; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:34:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1664174073; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=dsYH/YQ8rXPYZuNO78Cz2Hj5okpEMTs5l0kybMe6wvDXFqrUIvep8DiZoF5W49Wi/u 8Mzi4C6TXmvulA9e2Sy5JKuERM7715vJpzmwn5VpXHFo+X1oTz8LdZmYRKNoldW0LIHo HrWk58lVRRLIXvGA7zn7DQB7QUnQlMew0snLsr8Kwbotj743f+VgvaY1jyJfofZlqhHV QoU1DdGj/NN4tRvAcK9cx6rDdxbs0NtrBf4slch6XnVgD2ZeMpwGyr7F5PPPxiaSw9VR 3lic41SMts1LJd76kUHsF+QH1ZhXNRU6682UusqFCsjb6azajyHsfM2dYZLFukjyX5a2 sz4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=HwTuHzAPv4nxxuIY2UlGcLCbqrbmrZntaQjsErGduaE=; b=L29P8DW/vD7w64njWk08oI3kn+IcKm3oyFIr+ioY9PgEY7HIiq7X6fvDsvmV42xt0/ Q3G3fhzObOg7iIcwoO2Y0SkvtXTd+wFM/5FlA4pqVsTZvdFj5CaXVkKfriro+GJOCZNx j7Cw50fkjETvi+qMgmO/kvAYuHQb3C/5OtpFd3szs0p1tpTrh07MW+qAaLdKma0+3Xh8 vbZfzGGO0ByTwjL9eUYUqhsSze8C6RSDbx5mhb1DxlIB2zaJM/t61O9UPliHXKvbE9p3 I+iVhWHWYcHfSe9HyZ/FCZdUUZAqOoVwVw6BJziIZOcXS0gjbzl2AYbUdA9F8lrUXMAZ c61w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=mhhMSbuc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h8-20020a170902ac8800b001715a583d46si9964687plr.474.2022.09.25.23.34.07; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=mhhMSbuc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229697AbiIZGYt (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 02:24:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34536 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232965AbiIZGYr (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2022 02:24:47 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A2F064F2; Sun, 25 Sep 2022 23:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FC6B818D2; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:24:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D80E6C433D6; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 06:24:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1664173482; bh=SEwUUQrr6k5PLSyi2fjuCqZdrPa/9arlIxbgN1unuqA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=mhhMSbuckchOV+Ydzn7bwvDIGmOGTVORgEbvlasEbhe6zsMxW0NMH5cJoQPpEzGN8 Coq624fVCaqgcNDVpi3WhrnX6Wmd5N7+ZDsvIV7rPF4pczU85V5xdRfa2J20qzsIm9 ihEi+czx1zWUlrMk9U0vEUPaojqMFTZjuFMNpUkI= Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 08:24:39 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Sasha Levin , "anna@kernel.org" , "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , "it+linux-nfs@molgen.mpg.de" , "pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de" , Trond Myklebust , Kurt Garloff Subject: Re: nfs_scan_commit: BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 000000001d473c07 Message-ID: References: <0e1263a1-9d3d-a6cf-deb7-197ab1eed437@leemhuis.info> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0e1263a1-9d3d-a6cf-deb7-197ab1eed437@leemhuis.info> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 08:00:46AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [adding Greg and Sasha to the recipients, to ensure they see this; CCing > Kurt as well, to keep him in the loop] > > On 22.09.22 15:44, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 13:42 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> Am 21.09.22 um 14:44 schrieb Trond Myklebust: > >>> On Wed, 2022-09-21 at 13:42 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > >> > >>>> Moving from Linux 5.10.113 to 5.15.69, starting Mozilla > >>>> Thunderbird or > >>>> Mozilla Firefox with the home on NFS, both programs get killed, > >>>> and > >>>> Linux 5.15.69 logs: > >>>> > >>>> ``` > >>>> [ 3827.604396] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: > >>>> 000000001d473c07 > >>>> [ 3827.611297] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode > >>>> [ 3827.616452] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page > >>>> [ 3827.621604] PGD 0 P4D 0 > >>>> [ 3827.624152] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > >>>> [ 3827.627657] CPU: 0 PID: 2378 Comm: firefox Not tainted > >>>> 5.15.69.mx64.435 #1 > >>>> [ 3827.634551] Hardware name: Dell Inc. Precision Tower > >>>> 3620/0MWYPT, BIOS 2.20.0 12/09/2021 > >> > >> […] > >> > >>>> [ 3827.743328] Call Trace: > >>>> [ 3827.745779]  > >>>> [ 3827.747883]  nfs_scan_commit+0x76/0xb0 [nfs] > >>>> [ 3827.752167]  __nfs_commit_inode+0x108/0x180 [nfs] > >>>> [ 3827.756886]  nfs_wb_all+0x59/0x110 [nfs] > >>>> [ 3827.760822]  nfs4_inode_return_delegation+0x58/0x90 [nfsv4] > >>>> [ 3827.766413]  nfs4_proc_remove+0x101/0x110 [nfsv4] > >>>> [ 3827.771130]  nfs_unlink+0xf5/0x2d0 [nfs] > >>>> [ 3827.775065]  vfs_unlink+0x10b/0x280 > >>>> [ 3827.778563]  do_unlinkat+0x19e/0x2c0 > >>>> [ 3827.782158]  __x64_sys_unlink+0x3e/0x60 > >>>> [ 3827.786002]  ? __x64_sys_readlink+0x1b/0x30 > >>>> [ 3827.790192]  do_syscall_64+0x40/0x90 > >>>> [ 3827.793779]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb > >> > >> […] > >> > >>>> ``` > >>>> > >>> > >>> Does cherry-picking commit 6e176d47160c ("NFSv4: Fixes for > >>> nfs4_inode_return_delegation()") into 5.15.69 from the upstream > >>> kernel > >>> tree fix the problem? > >>> > >>> 8<--------------------------------------------------- > >>> From 6e176d47160cec8bcaa28d9aa06926d72d54237c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > >>> 2001 > >>> From: Trond Myklebust > >>> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 10:58:12 +0200 > >>> Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4: Fixes for nfs4_inode_return_delegation() > >> > >> […] > >> > >> Indeed with that commit, present since v5.16-rc1, we are unable to > >> reproduce the issue, so it seems to be the fix. It looks like there > >> are > >> not a lot of 5.15 NFS users out there. ;-) > >> > > > > I believe this is a dependency that was introduced by the back port of > > commit e591b298d7ec ("NFS: Save some space in the inode") into 5.15.68. > > So the reason it wasn't seen is because the change is very recent. > > Side note: I wonder if that is causing this problem from Kurt as well: > https://lore.kernel.org/all/f6755107-b62c-a388-0ab5-0a6633bf9082@garloff.de/ > > > FYI Greg and Sasha: please also consider pulling 6e176d47160c ("NFSv4: > > Fixes for nfs4_inode_return_delegation()") into that stable series. > > Greg, I noticed you in the past few days added quite a few patches into > the queue for the next 5.15.y release, but this one was not among them > afaics. So just to be sure: is that still on your todo list or is more > needed to get 6e176d47160c added in time for the next stable -rc? I don't see any request by anyone in the stable@vger.kernel.org history asking for that commit to be added, so no, it was not in my queue. I'll go add it now, thanks. greg k-h