Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8787C636CD for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 16:12:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229785AbjBEQMA (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:12:00 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53500 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229519AbjBEQL7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Feb 2023 11:11:59 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50A7513DFD for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 08:11:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1675613472; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ObU9haac15/5ndYLncPOcflnXZb09Zw6shZT8Mhn0eI=; b=h3AGrh7PWthcPFf+DJQq1bZgsV7npw2w4ZT59mZCzVqpsKOS6MOVEXoYhoz1RjiEnBgmHx p8nS+q87nHKcCfq2SoM1D6XOu5kQz/BWFhoR1poYR0SM6Tqnf+XzjYHDe0Z2MqqoPjyO4b Ve1gvTeWisALjs92q2i5IdBeepLaX6Y= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-50-c6LIMRUfP_CjoR0g_E4NXw-1; Sun, 05 Feb 2023 11:11:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: c6LIMRUfP_CjoR0g_E4NXw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B9E3C025B8; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 16:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.176.1] (unknown [10.22.50.5]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46D0140EBF4; Sun, 5 Feb 2023 16:11:07 +0000 (UTC) From: Benjamin Coddington To: Jeff Layton Cc: Trond Myklebust , Thorsten Leemhuis , Hugh Dickins , Charles Edward Lever , Linux NFS Mailing List , Anna Schumaker , Alexander Viro , Amir Goldstein , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Linux kernel regressions list Subject: Re: git regression failures with v6.2-rc NFS client Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 11:11:06 -0500 Message-ID: <3AD5F198-42A1-49F3-85CA-D245775F87DF@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <8f122cb0304632b391759788fe1f72ea1bab1ba0.camel@kernel.org> References: <9A4A5673-691D-47EC-BC44-C43BE7E50A48@oracle.com> <5FF4061F-108C-4555-A32D-DDBFA80EE4E7@redhat.com> <44CB1E86-60E0-4CF0-9FD4-BB7E446542B7@redhat.com> <1AAC6854-2591-4B21-952A-BC58180B4091@oracle.com> <41813D21-95C8-44E3-BB97-1E9C03CE7FE5@redhat.com> <79261B77-35D0-4E36-AA29-C7BF9FB734CC@oracle.com> <104B6879-5223-485F-B099-767F741EB15B@redhat.com> <966AEC32-A7C9-4B97-A4F7-098AF6EF0067@oracle.com> <545B5AB7-93A6-496E-924E-AE882BF57B72@hammerspace.com> <4dd32d-9ea3-4330-454a-36f1189d599@google.com> <0D7A0393-EE80-4785-9A83-44CF8269758B@hammerspace.com> <8B4F6A20-D7A4-4A22-914C-59F5EA79D252@hammerspace.com> <15679CC0-6B56-4F6D-9857-21DCF1EFFF79@redhat.com> <031C52C0-144A-4051-9B4C-0E1E3164951E@hammerspace.com> <05BEEF62-46DF-4FAC-99D4-4589C294F93A@redhat.com> <8f122cb0304632b391759788fe1f72ea1bab1ba0.camel@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On 5 Feb 2023, at 6:24, Jeff Layton wrote: > I may be missing something, but would it be possible to move to a more > stable scheme for readdir cookies for tmpfs? Yes, totally possible but it was pointed out earlier that's not going to land in 6.2, so this thread's been focused on trying to reason if 85aa8ddc3818 counts as a regression. Ben