Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <16786c40c480b96cfe3a1727cad6d7f389f8f17f.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Fedora packages for ktls testing available
From:   Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To:     Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc:     Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel-tls-handshake <kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev>
Date:   Fri, 21 Apr 2023 10:29:06 -0400
In-Reply-To: <2CFA4DB8-7EAD-46CB-970F-67CD5FCF9D36@oracle.com>
References: <85ee133945a9f816ffb9612146a6f835c6d443ec.camel@redhat.com>
         <2CFA4DB8-7EAD-46CB-970F-67CD5FCF9D36@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Evolution 3.48.0 (3.48.0-1.fc38) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 13:32 +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>=20
> > On Apr 20, 2023, at 12:17 PM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> wrote:
> >=20
> > I have a Fedora COPR repo set up with the latest RPC with TLS bits from
> > Chuck:
> >=20
> >    https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jlayton/rpctls/
> >=20
> > It has a kernel package (currently based on v6.3-rc7), an updated nfs-
> > utils package (only needed by the NFS server), and a new ktls-utils
> > package (0.8 based currently) that I'm working to get into the main
> > Fedora repos after the kernel patches are merged.
> >=20
> > My goal is to keep this up to date until the relevant code starts
> > landing in the main Fedora repos.
>=20
> Hi Jeff-
>=20
> Excellent work!
>=20
> I've had questions about building ktls-utils so I'm interested in
> your experience packaging it.
>=20
> On Fedora, folks have installed keyutils-lib and keyutils-lib-devel
> but ./configure still reports:
>=20
>   Package 'libkeyutils', required by 'virtual:world', not found
>=20
> Did you encounter this issue, and if so, how did you resolve it?
>=20

Thanks! I missed adding the client patches to the most recent kernel
build, but they should be in there in the next one (brewing now).

No, I haven't seen that error. I did go several rounds with failed
package builds due to build dependencies. The current specfile has this:

    BuildRequires:  gcc make gnutls-devel libnl3-devel systemd-rpm-macros
    BuildRequires:  autoconf automake keyutils-libs-devel glib2-devel

...and that allowed it to build on f37 and up for me.
--=20
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>